几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 仿射空间:CAX软件开发(三)二次开发与程序设计 » CAD二次开发 » SolidWorks二次开发
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-13, 02:17 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】shape feature will not be supported in sw 2010

shape feature will not be supported in sw 2010
has anyone seen this message in 09:
warning shape feature1 - the shape feature will not be supported in solidworks 2010. we recommend that you replace this feature by a freeform feature type.
while i am not a big fan of this feature, it was very useful to the industrial design of the shape of this one product, where a feature set that used the shape feature early on made a base shape was saved as six different parts (didn't do configs v parts cause the shape wasn't going to change), which were all placed and mated with the same planes in an assembly, and then in-contextualy edited to form 6 idfferent parts all based on this initial shape. now all parts and assemblies are compaining about the shape feature and telling me to replace it with a free form. there is no way this can happen as it blows things up, and there are a couple hundred features after this shape feature in each part. it looks like this part will never make it into 2010, or i'm gonig to have to dump these parts as parasolids.
does anyone else use shape just so i know before i make a request to sw to keep it?
rfus
find a job or post a job opening
not me. i think i tried it once just to see what it did. have absolutely no use for it in my line of work. sorry.
if your company is big enough, or your need large enough, you may be able to get sw corp to help you with converting the models. it seems odd that this feature would no longer be supported. i would confirm with your var. something may have changed, or maybe your request will change their minds.
matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
maybe they wont develop or improve it anymore, but i doubt they will trash it completely. you should still be able to import it from old files.
a good example would be excel bom. they arent really featured anymore as the sw boms are now better for the job. you can however still use them when opening an old part.
we'll see.
the warning seems pretty stern, indicating to me that i better get rid of this feature if these parts are going to rebuild in 2010. it has also thrown up the triangle/! mark up and turned the text brown in the feature tree on the subassems and parts, which just bugs me and looks like sloppy modeling. maybe its my ocd acting up.
we aren't very big, so i doubt they will bend over backwards. there is no way to perfectly recreate this shape by using freeform, so their suggestion is no good.
rfus
have you contacted your var and have them ask sw to see if its going to be supported or will it cause your files to fail.
i think i would be finding out, before throwing a fit over something that may still support if you use it in the past.
regards,
scott baugh, cswp
the warning is very explicit.
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】do you use the excel bom feature yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 10:27 AM
How to start SW 2007 or SW 20006 via SW API? If I have two different versions of SW yogy SolidWorks二次开发 1 2007-05-21 09:19 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:35 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多