几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 10:24 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 drafting methods

drafting methods
is it okay to dimension section views.
definitely, otherwise they would only be good for assembly drawings.
you shouldn't dimension in an isometric view because it doesn't show true size and shape and you can't dimension to a "hidden" feature. cut views, section views, etc. are all okay as long as it is clear what the feature is that you are dimensioning (true size and shape).
you can find everything you need to know about section views in multi and secional view drawings asme/ansi y14.3. it's a good buy. i'm currently redesigning a high speed miniture mechanism and was looking at the drawings. i found numerous mistakes: wrong projections, wrong callouts, dimensions to hidden lines and the granddaddy of them all a section view with hidden lines
best regards,
heckler
sr. mechanical engineer
sw2005 sp 5.0 & pro/e 2001
dell precision 370
p4 3.6 ghz, 1gb ram
xp pro sp2.0
nvidia quadro fx 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
never argue with an idiot. they'll bring you down to their level and beat you with experience every time.
it depends on which standard you are refering to, and whether you are using board drawings or cad drawings of solid models. asme y14.41-2003 definitely allows dimensioning to axonometric views (which are similar to iso views) on the drawing.
section views are ok to dim. i agree, do not dim to hidden lines.
chris
systems analyst, i.s.
solidworks 06 4.1/pdmworks 06
autocad 06
palecactus
yes!
ok that's the short version.
i prefer sections to use of hidden line most of the time, i thought it was in a standard somewhere that sections etc are preferable but i couldn't find it last time i looked.
aardvarkdw,
i'm with you on iso views but in my post the other day people seemed to think 14.41 might allow this.
ken
not only are sections preferable, but dimensioning to hidden lines is not a preferable method per y14.5. para "dimensions should be shown in true profile and refer to visible outlines."
omitted in my previous post: para 1.4(c)
in some cases it is ok to dim to a "hidden" line, by drawing a broken out section, that makes the "hidden" line visible... but you should use this method discretely.
wes c.
------------------------------
when they broke open molecules, they found they were only stuffed with atoms. but when they broke open atoms, they found them stuffed with explosions...
but then it is no longer hidden - that is a widely used method to get around hidden lines.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】getsysvar and getangdir [individual methods for seprate sys yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 11:25 AM
【转帖】drafting stadards manual yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:41 PM
【转帖】drafting methods yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:40 PM
【转帖】decimal dimensioningfractional equivalents yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】creating drafting standards yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:08 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:18 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多