几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 12:29 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 quantities on item call-outs

quantities on item call-outs
one of my co-workers and i are attempting to unify the cad standards at my workplace and we've come to a head over how to call out quantites in item discriptions.
i was always taught that quantites go in parenthasis. if for example, i needed two bent plates, i would call out:
(2) bt pl
my coworker, agrees with me that this looks good, and makes sense, but is convinced it's incorrect nonetheless and insists it ought to be:
2-bt pl
does anyone know if there is a standard about this, and what it actually says, if not what do you see most often in your experience?

must be a structural thing, i've never worked anywhere that assy quantities were in the description, they were always in the parts list.
not many posters in this forum from the structural world, mostly mechanical & aerospace, and i'm not sure this forum has a good record of answering structural qs. if you don't get a good answer you may want to check out one of the more structures minded forum.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
i agree with kenat.
i would use 2x on the drawing, 2 on the qty column within the pl, or bom.
chris
solidworks/pdmworks 08 3.1
autocad 06/08
just to be clear if this was a mechanical drawing per asme y14.5m-1994, i believe that ctopher is correct.
that being said if this isn't drawn to that standard and i saw both of the op's examples on the print, i would say the first example is correct,(2) bt pl. a dash is often used in abbreviations and other notes and has very specific meanings, as in thread callouts. i think that there is too much room for misinterpretation by using a dash and would instead use parenthesis.
david
op asks about standard, for a mechanical drawing to asme standards then y14.24-1999 is the relevant standard. however, i don't think this is directly relevant to most structural drawings.
kenat, probably the least qualified checker you'll ever meet...
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】ambiguous call to overload functions in odstring.h yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 03:56 PM
【转帖】quantities on item call-outs yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:35 PM
【转帖】part quantities when using stacked balloons yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:11 PM
【转帖】哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:13 PM
哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:10 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多