几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:01 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 aci vs pci

aci vs pci
i'm reviewing a set of precast concrete submittals. the precast engineer has taken it upon himself to redesign the cast-in-place embedments that the precast will attach to.
he's designing them using pci 6th edition (chapter 6), and is coming up with drastically different results than what we had designed using aci.
the contractor has offered a credit to the owner, and now the owner is hot to change. problem is, i am under the impression that pci is precast only and aci governs cast-in-place (although i can't find anything in either code that limits the scope of the code.
we're reviewing his calcs against pci now, because we can't believe the difference, but if he did everything correctly, i need to ensure that pci is acceptable for cast-in-place design.
check out our whitepaper library.
if you are under the ibc code, it should spelled out which code to follow in chapter 19 and there are references in chapter 35.
yes be careful with this one. precast concrete has better compaction, quality control and tolerances, than in-situ concrete. i imagine this difference may be reflected by way of less conservative procedures for the precast.
see section 6.5 of the pci design handbook and page 10-36. pci says they have performed tests that substantiate their connection method as a code-approved alternative. but it is ultimately up to the engineer-of-record and building official to approve it.
the pci handbook 6th edition uses the procedure from aci 318-02. the values you get should be close to the same. pci justs presents the information differently. pci breaks everything down so that you connection fails into one specific case. aci is the general stuff everything is checked and the numbers will show what condition controls. pci also makes some assumptions about the failure planes. aci-318-05 makes everything much clearer than 02. 02 is a little hard to follow. just check it using either book and the answers should be pretty close
that's just it, they answers weren't remotely close -- the pci version came up with dramatically smaller embed requirements. ends up that the submitted calculations had an error in them -- once corrected, pci and aci were pretty close.
thanks for all the feedback, i really appreciate it.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
aci documents huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:56 AM
aci 350-06 required by ibc 06 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:50 AM
aci 318 appendix d huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:42 AM
【转帖】哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:13 PM
哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:35 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多