几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:39 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 building joint spacing

building joint spacing
i have a two story school i am designing that is apperoximately 320'x100'. the structure is masonry loadbearing walls at the perimeter and along the interior corridor which runs down the middle of the building parallel with the 320' exterior walls. the second floor is metal joists with non-composite metal deck + concrete, and the roof structure consists of steel joists and metal deck. my question is if i need a building joint to break up the 320' length. the loadbearing masonry walls have control joints about 24' on centers and the cmu bond beams are continuous through the control joints at the roof and the 2nd floor.

others will have different opinions, but i would place an expansion joint at mid-length. and i would use control joints at 20' centres, with the bond beams discontinuous at the joints.
you are going to need a shear wall in the 100' direction. you're not going to get the deck to work at a 3:1 aspect ratio. that's a good place to locate your expansion joint.
frv,
i do have a few shear walls in the 100' direction.
i was thinking i would not need an expansion joint because i have cj's in the cmu. i know the cmu walls will still have alot of stiffness at approximetly 24' in length, but i was assuming this would still allow for some expansion and contraction of the 2nd floor and roof diaphrams. it can't be any more stiff than having a steel framed building 300' long with braced frames located at each end of the building.
how much trouble would it be to put a building joint near the middle of the 320' direction?
imho, at 320' you are right at the 'do it/don't do it' line. if it was reasonably easy to put the joint in, i would do it and sleep well at night.
if it will be difficult to get the joint in, with some proper detailing, you can make the 320' work.
without a joint, i would tend to break my bond beams every 2 or 3 joints to allow some shrinkage movement by the cmu walls at the bond beam elevations.
jmho.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
building into a hillside huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:39 PM
building expansion joint or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:37 PM
building dimensions to consider when finding wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:36 PM
allowable high rise building drif huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:58 AM
ada, osha and code violations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:09 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:10 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多