几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 04:32 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 deciphering air entrainment requirements

deciphering air entrainment requirements
the summerized specs read:
for normal weight concrete air content =
鈥o entrained air for concrete placed in foundation
鈥?% +- 1.5% entrained air uno
鈥?% +- 1.0% entrained air for mixes with compressive strength greater than or equal to 5000 psi
鈥?% +- 1.0% entrained air for mixes with compressive strength less than or equal to 5000 psi placed in aggressive
(aggressive environment = exterior)
so for slab-on-grade with interior exposure and placed with 4000 psi concrete the air requirement is ______?
by the specs given it's either 5+-1% or the member is considered part of the foundation and thus no a/e required.
for sog interior exposure, i'd spec 0-3% to accommodate entrapped air. no air entrainment necessary... air entrainment does, however, help with placing concrete.
i'd read your specs as having to conform to #1, 3.5 to 6.5. i think the spec writer has 1 and 3 confused. should have higher for exterior exposure if freeze-thaw is an issue.
dik
agree with dik. the spec asks for 5%+-1.5%. i would check with the engineer to verify this requirement, particularly if the slab has a mineral aggregate hardener or is trowel finished.
i understand the conclusion; however, is it possible that the eor considers s-o-g, retaining walls, and foundation walls as "foundation" and thus no a/e required?
on the general notes page of the structural drawings under the foundation section there are notes on footings, foundation walls, drilled piers, s-o-g, retaining walls, soil density, bearing capacity, etc.
he must be considering s-o-g as "foundation", right? that's the only way his a/e criteria make sense. also makes more sense considering the vast majority of interior slabs get trowel finish. 6 1/2% + trowel = delamination right?
what say you guys?
agree with dik...interior application, so air entrainment not necessary; however, there is ambiguity in the specification so it requires interpretation by the author or the engineer in responsible charge. submit an rfi.
i don't think of the slab-on-grade as part of the foundation. however, i don't know of an official definition that would rule it out. if your eor has slab notes under the foundation section, then he/she may consider it as such.
from what i've read, steel troweling of slabs with 5%+-1 1/2% air can contribute to blisters, finishing problems and weak concrete at the surface.
generally... for an ambiguity in the contract, the courts rule against the person who drafted the contract...fwiw
dik
boffintech, a few questions for you.
1. is this project a building?
2. is the project located in a a region where air-entrained concrete is typically specified for freeze-thaw resistance?
3. if the answer to the preceeding question is negative, do you know why air-entrained concrete was specified?
henri,
1, yes
2, yes
the given criteria do not cover all possible concrete
what method of concrete placement will you be using?
1. gunite (dry mix)
2. shotcrete (wet mix)
3. cast in place
if your using gunite, i don't think an air entraining admixture can even be added.
3. cast-in-place
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
air entrained concrete vs. non air entrained concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:24 AM
affects of air entrainmen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:21 AM
air force engineer huangyhg 精密机械 0 2009-09-05 10:16 PM
air conditioning huangyhg 精密机械 0 2009-09-05 10:15 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:02 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多