几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 10:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 engg vs. conventional construction - residences in florida

engg vs. conventional construction - residences in florida
i'm interested to hear other engineers' experiences regarding use of conventional construction versus engineered designs for residences -- specifically in florida.
my experience is as follows: have spent my career doing structural engineering in california (sf bay area). building departments here require engineering typically on custom homes, including modifications and additions.
have recently been working in florida and discovered that building officials in a particular county with 150 mph wind speeds do not require calculations to be submitted for residential designs. including large, custom homes. if i'm correct, both the florida residential building code and ibc residential both require engineering for lateral loads in areas where wind speeds are in excess of 110 mph.
i work in the northeast. it is my understanding that submittimng calculations is a west coast thing. no state in the east that i am aware actually requires the submittal of calculations. partly becasue no one is usually qualified to check them. tyically they just want a stamp on the plans to prove they were designed. which i personally think is more valuable. the plans are what they build from. it does not matter what the calcs say if the plans are wrong. i would rather see the time spent preparing better plans then calcs that are good enough to submitt.
many state have a peer review process were the owner hires a second engineer to peer review the plans for significant structures.
i would be curious what teh west coast people think of the value in submiting these calcs.
and yes at least boca, ibc and ubc codes have a line in it that says "shall submitt details and calculations" i don;t know about the sbc
i have been working in florida for 6 years now. i have seen a recent trend of building departments requiring calculations be submitted. i was never asked before 1 year ago. now in the last year, i have had several projects where this has been required. mainly i deal in commercial world, but we also do condos and some custom homes. the last project it was requested was a single story tilt-up concrete 50x100ft classroom building with a concrete psi joist and slab roof. i was very surprised they would ask for calcs on such a simple and robust building.
why does a building official want calculations if the drawings are sealed and signed by a licensed professional engineer? our office had to submit calculations along with sealed and signed drawings for a restaurant near atlanta, georgia. i've worked in oklahoma for 10 years and never submitted calcs for any project here.
archeng59, i guess the calculations provide clear evidence that the structural drawings were based on actual structural analysis/design.
look at it this way. this approach cuts out the individual who wants a quick buck and is prepared to kick back and just stamp drawings presented by a non-engineer and it also creates more work for those engineers who truly design.
i have not done any structural design in ages but out here in so. ca, calculation submittals (when i designed) were required for the majority of bldgs except for most typical group r-3, type v residential dwellings. structural plan checkers would go through the calcs thoroughly.
here's my perspective --
for design of structures that are not in seismic or high wind areas, i concur -- there's no reason to submit calculations, provided that a building is within the limits of conventional construction.
however, for design of structures within high seismic, or high wind areas (we're talking about a jurisdiction within 150 mph wind zone), the design of an engineered structure -- i.e. based on code level lateral forces, will be a wholly different animal from same building built by conventional construction methods. the lateral-load-resisting system will be entirely different, significantly beefier, by the engineered method.
as far as roles go, of course it's the responsibility of the designer to design according to the code. if my interpretation is correct, conventional construction does not apply even to residences in 150 mph wind zones. does responsibiity apply only to designers? only the building department has the ability to enforce the code.
bottom line - by my interpretation, wood framed residences, per the florida building code (or by ibc measure) are required to be engineered where wind speeds are in excess of 110 mph.
one reference in particular is table r602.10.1, "wall bracing" of the 2003 irc covers areas only up to 110 mph.
i hope this is not hijacking the original thread....
i completely agree that calculations are required by code for most buildings. i just don't know if i see the value in it. if the person who receives the calculations is qualified to review the calculations; then they should be qualified to do their own calculation if they think something does not work. if they are not qualified to review them, why am i taking the time to make them?
if with my experience, expertise and professional judgment i am completely comfortable designing a structure with no calculations and am willing to stamp it, why should anyone argue with me.... unless is does not work. if it does not work, sue me, discipline me what ever.
most of the building officials and plan reviewers that i know are not structural engineers. some of the people in oklahoma may have a background in construction or architecture. what about those in the western states? i've worked with the state fire marshal in oklahoma to perform plan reviews. as an experienced structural engineer, i was able to look at the drawings to determine if they appeared to be properly engineered without needing to review calculations.
many of the plan reviewers in the phoenix area are registrants and understand structures and the code. their reviews are incredibly detailed at times...sometimes to the point of being annoying.
honestly, it seems really weird to hear of you guys submitting plans w/o calculations. unless it's just an architect asking for a beam size, we always send calcs along with the drawings.
are we talking about doing the calcs and submitting them or doing the calcs and not submitting them?
we don't typically send calculations unless they are specifically reqested and are part of the contract. usually this is for south florida commercial projects and specialty engineering projects.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
difference between a construction joint and an expansion joi huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:40 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
conventional wood frame construction - 7 floors - feasible huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:50 PM
construction joint 2 column face huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:26 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:46 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多