几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 11:11 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 fall arrest system anchor poin

fall arrest system anchor point
a fall arrest system is required to have an anchor point capable of holding 5000#. is the anchor point required to hold this 5000# without exceeding the yield stress? i have a beam that can hold 4500# in the elastic region and about 8000# in the plastic region. does this meet osha code?
find a job or post a job opening
cfr 1915.159(a)(9) which is for shipyards states:
"anchorages shall be capable of supporting at least 5,000 lb per employee attached or shall be designed, installed and used as follows:
as part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; andunder the direction and supervision of a qualified person"
my interpretation is 5000 lb prescriptive is on yield of material which gives approximately 1.6 factor of safety on ultimate. if you design the "system" you need a factor of safety of 2 on ultimate for the maximum load you will see in your "system".
quote:
anchorages shall be capable of supporting at least 5,000 lb per employee attached or shall be designed, installed and used as follows
my take on the wording is that these anchorages must handle these loads as a normal condition, e.g., not require replacement or checking after such loading.
ttfn
i have designed anchorages of this type to ultimate stength. the compny for which i have designed them has a standiding proceedure that requires inspection of an anchorage point should it be subjected to a fall-protection loading.
i also note that this company has a dedicated deprtment devoted to safety and is diligent in monitoring these anchor points.
i think the safety factor of 2.0 should be applied to ultimate loading. companies like cm mockabee, who do cables and sheaves etc. typically apply their safety factors versus ultimate and this seems similar to that.
continued inspection is also a must
best to add some web or flange stiffing, cross bracing, post tention tendons (lots of options dependant on your application)...to your beam to get the 5000# with a factor of safety.
rule of thumb is...would you put on a harness and jump after the design is complete? if not, then replace the beam or add some meat!.
actually the ultimate load 5000#'s and the actual working load to which the anchor would be subjected, ie 250 #'s falling thru 6' or 8', can't remember which at the moment, are of course different. never test an existing anchor to 5000 #'s, never post the capacity of the anchor as 5000 #'s. we used to test anchors, subject them to 2500#'s pull incrementally, recording deflection, can't re
i am leaning toward the 5000# based on ultimate strength. as long as the beam is sure to arrest the fall, i see no need to strengthen. in case of a fall, the beam will be inspected after the accident, and if there is any plastic deformation, then the beam will be replaced.
if there is any code or law that requires more than this, please let me know, otherwise i will leave the beam as is.
thank you all for your posts,
weron4u
i see i'm a little late responding to this thread, but i'll put my .02 in anyway:
i work at heights everyday and am familiar with oshas regs.
the anchorage must be capable of supporting 5,000lbs. per worker. however, personnel using personal fall arrest systems with a body harness must have maximum arresting forces limited to 1,800 lbs. there's also an allowance that a 'designed/engineered' anchorage can be designed with a 2:1 safety factor, which would then be 3,600 lbs.
in reality, virtually all shock arrest/decelerating lanyards produced today limit maximum forces to around 900lbs., and that's with a big boy falling.
if you've got an anchorage that's good for 4,500lbs, you should be able to sleep well.
osha requires all pfa to be inspected after a fall, so it's reasonable to assume the anchorage should be inspected as well.
regards,
j
correct yes 'theclimber', 5000 lbs is the failure or ultimate limits state, not at all the 'specified' or 'working' load for the anchor.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
fall arrest points huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:10 AM
design beam for fall arrest anchorage huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:12 PM
anchor point for fall arrest device huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:57 AM
如何得到MessageBox窗口里的提示文本? huangyhg vc编程 1 2008-07-24 01:07 AM
【转帖】续实例解析socket编程模型之异步通信篇 yogy C# 1 2007-08-01 03:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:26 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多