几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 01:04 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 massachusetts building code load combinations

massachusetts building code: load combinations
the massachusetts building code gives 7 load combinations for asd.
does anyone know what the "-" sign is for in combinations 5 and 6.
the combinations are as follows:
1. dead
2. dead + floor live + roof live (or snow)
3. dead + floor live + 0.5 roof live + wind
4. dead + floor live + roof live + 0.5 wind
5. 0.67 dead - wind
6. 0.67 dead - 0.8 seismic
7. dead + 0.9 floor live + 0.6 snow + 0.8 seismic
it looks like checking an uplift condition (such as suction on a flat roof)
ps- the suction is due to uplift wind pressure component per code, not the full horizontal wind pressure.
sacrebleu,
thanks.
i want to apply this in a computer program. would it be corect to say that for this combination i do not input the positive pressure, but instead input the negative pressure due to suction only?.
thanks for your help
tweedledee,
here is my take on the "-" wind situation. when you are designing roof rafters and their connections, for instance, you have to consider all the various ways that wind can act on the roof and the connections holding the roof to the main structure. when wind acts inwardly against a roof (whether flat or sloped), i.e. wind "blowing down" on the roof, the equations with the "+" wind take care of these situations.
however, wind does not just act inwardly against a roof. wind can also acts outwardly against a roof, i.e. having a "suction" effect on the roof, and trying to blow the roof out of the its connections and away from the main structure. hence, the "-" wind equations. "-" wind equations provide you the suction effect on the roof. obviously, the dead load of the roof itself acts in some way to counter the "suction" effect. if you have a heavy roof, the "suction" effect is less, or if you have a light roof, the "suction" effect is more. the code acknowledges this, and allows you to put in the put in the effect of the dead load, but they only allow you to use 0.67 (or 2/3) of the dead load, not the entire dead load.
there are a few ways you can input the "-" pressure. if you calculating manually, yes, you do input the "-" pressure for eqns. 5 and 6. if you are using a structural analysis modeling software, such as staad, strap, etc. you invert the direction of the wind so that it is acting "upwards" against the roof in the local axis.
the effect of the "suction" wind is significant on connection design, i.e. you want to make sure that your connections do not fail (either in pullout pullover, etc.) when you have the full effect of the "suction" wind.
on another point, check your code to see whether it allows for a reduction when you have a combination of two or more loads (other that the dead load).
hope this helps, and please post more questions if you still don't understand how the "-" wind thing works.
adding further, for a pitched roof, the ubc and ibc codes that i am familiar have 2 different wind uplift conditions: one is suction on entire roof, using a certain coefficient to determine negative wind pressure. the second condition is uplift on the leeward side of the roof, using the vertical component of the negative wind pressure which exists on the leeward side. that coefficient is different. this is completely defined in asce 7-xx (latest is -02 i believe). there are ansi publications which define this similarly. since you are east coast, you don't use the ubc,of which i am very familiar. the ubc called this "method 1" for determining wind pressures. the ibc has tabkles for all this, but they are rather confusing unless you study a commentary.
gagngr05 & sacrebleu, thanks.
i think i have a good understanding of it now.
dont get too caught up in the roof situation. what about the "0.67d - 0.8 seismic"? i dont think i'd want to design my braced frames using that combination. almost seems like a misprint, but i dont know for sure.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
canadian national building code - load combinations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:29 PM
building load combinations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:40 PM
ada, osha and code violations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:09 AM
1997 ubc load combinations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:50 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:32 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多