几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:21 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 soil friction angle question

soil friction angle question
i am hoping someone can help me out a little with this.
i need to confirm that the soil friction angle will equal the angle that the failure wedge makes with the horizontal. specifically, say i have a retaining wall with soil on the left and a friction angle of 30 degrees. i am now going to draw the soil failure plane from the bottom of the wall to the top of the soil. i draw a line that extends from the bottom of the wall (up and to the left) until it reaches the soil. the acute angle formed between the horizontal at the base of the wall and the failure plane i just drew will be 30 degrees.
is this a correct statement?
i may be looking in the wrong places, but i can't find it in my geotech book, or foundations book, and i don't have my soils notes at work.
check out our whitepaper library.
for active earth pressure with cohesionless soil, the angle that you are describing (failure with horizontal) will be=
45+phi/2. and phi being the angle of friction.
the situation that you are describing is related to slope stabilty without retaining wall.
it is not correct. the failure wedge for active earth pressure will depend on the active pressure theory you use. rankine for instance, assumes a failure wedge forms at 45 + φ/2 for the active case, 45 - φ/2 for the passive, where φ is the soil friction angle. coulomb will be different.
look up culmann's graphical solution also.
this information can be found in principles of geotechnical engineering by das.
why do you need to draw failure planes, out of curiosity?
you can find the solution on sheet 7.2-62 in navfac dm-7.2. available for free at
i have a retaining wall that is 6' from rock and i need to take this into account because a sub bulit a wall to span vertically when it designed to span horizontally. the loading conditions are much different now and i need to check it out. anyway, it is restrained so i need to use tehe at-rest pressure.
i am assuming the 45+-phi/2 is not valid for at-rest pressure? what would you use for at-rest pressure failure plane?
do you mean that the soil is restrained by the retaining wall that is why the soil is at rest? if the soil is at rest then there will be no failure, eventhough the soil mass will exert lateral pressure.
the classical retaining wall system must consider active earth pressure. this is due to the fact that it takes just a little bit of lateral movement to mobilize active condition in the soil mass. and the amount of deflection in all retaining wall system (that at least we design) deflect enougn to create active condition.
let the sub pay for getting the help of a local geotech to get the correct loading in the siturtion he has created.
do not take the liability yourself.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
agree with shin and mike.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
shear resisting mechanisms for piles caps huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 09:50 PM
how do i figure the angle of a ridge cap along a hip ridge huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:18 PM
does flexural reinforcement count for shear friction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:15 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:21 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多