几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 06:35 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 vibratory compaction equipment on under-ground structures

vibratory compaction equipment on under-ground structures.
i have a client with a 95 year old house that sits on an unreinforced concrete basement. the city is doing a major road rebuild that will come within 25 feet of his basement wall. his concern is that the construction equipment will damage his home. the primary concern is about the vibratory compaction equipment.

haydenwse - i had a similar post though the equipment generating the vibration was more specific. perhaps you can benefit from some of the answers. see the thread:
monitor the vibrations with a good seismograph and set the trigger limits to no more than 1/4 of the peak particle velocity limit for historical structures (0.08 to 0.12 inches per second, depending on the reference).
set up at least 3 geophones...one at the foundation (usually set just off the foundation to prevent back reflection), one at the property line, and one halfway between those two. if you hit the trigger at the property line, stop the activity and make them use static compaction, not vibratory.
you know, it's not just the extra lateral pressure on the wall and the possibility of vibration induced settlement. i would also be concerned with the loosening of electrical and plumbing connections with the likelihood increased of a long term fire and water leak damage.
he should have hius lawyer draft a letter and raise the idea of compensation for this increased risk as an addidional lever to have then employ the static compactor.
there is a precedent on this if there is documentation and associated problems with the items during or shortly after the compaction. similar to being compensated for long term medical problems after an accident.
as mentioned above...document, document, document. good luck.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
thanks for the responses.
ron, in the thread provided by qshake, you mention some florida dot guidelines for controlling construction vibrations when working near existing structure. that sounds like just the ticket for my needs. were you able to locate them.
the project is in its public comment phase and the home owner wants to know if there are road construction techniques that would be less likely to cause problems. there is not a lot of fill required on this project which will help. from a "gut felling" level it would seem that high frequency and lower centrifugal force and amplitude would reduce the distance and impact of the equipment. does that sound correct?

one additional question.
this client has experienced ground water problems during the wet season (wa state) and is planning to install a french drain between the house and the roadway that will connect to a large catch basin that has been installed in the lower back yard. the native soil is mostly clay. i am curious if leaving this trench open throughout the construction would serve to isolate the structure from the construction vibration?

haydenwise...yes, the trench will help, but you still need to monitor the vibrations....i have attached a document that will help you with the vibration limits. it is the caltrans criteria...i still can't find my fdot document...will keep looking.
for some reason, it didn't upload...here it is..
thanks for paper ron. that gives me a lot of information.
it appears that the types of equipment that will be used on this project are not typically associated with architectural or structural damage at the 20-25 foot minimum distance my client will have.
i went to the blastmate web site and it appears that these units connect to a pc and run off software that is downloaded from the site. is this correct and do you have any idea what these things cost?

we typically use geosonics equipment because it is self contained. we rent the equipment and you can get various rates, depending on the time you intend to have the equipment.
i just reviewed a report in a litigation project where the opposing side used blastmate equipment. their results were very similar to ours under the same conditions of monitoring, thus seemingly good agreement between the pieces of equipment.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
structure dynamics huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:52 AM
more compaction 9and settlement0 questions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:12 PM
ground bearing slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:11 PM
does equipment meet seismic requirements huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:15 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:15 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多