几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 09:05 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 whl. loads on exist. slab on grade

whl. loads on exist. slab on grade
i am checking an exist. 6" slab on grade (f'c=3000 psi)that was designed in the late 1960's. it was supposed to be designed for 10k fork lift wheel loads, however when i use the aci-360 code and the pca wheel load charts i am coming up w/ a 7-8 inch required slab. i have also tried the wri and coe charts. the forklifts have been used for the past 35 years and have not been a major problem. i need to justify a 15k wheel load is okay.
any suggestions on why my check of the exist. slab won't work for the original design loads?? are there other methods to use other than the charts mentioned?

if the slab is on exceptionally "good" soil, the thickness of the concrete (up to a point) is of reduced concern. perhaps you get a geotech to investigate the properties of the soil under the slab and avise on what they find.
there is the possibility whilst it was originally designed for 10k, perhaps this load was never realized during its lifetime (and hence there is the perception that the current design is appropriate). theres also the possibility that this load was exceeded by a substantial margin.
i'm not sure how much luck you will have getting a geotech to agree to the fact that the entire subgrade has exceptional bearing capacity/stiffness. my experience with geotechs is that they are very conservative.
you may want to consider testing the slab in discrete locations with a 15k point load distributed over an approximate tire contact area - i know this option is really a pain, but better to have a controlled failure. afterall, if you cannot justify why the existing design works for 10k, how can you justify it for 50% more?
drw75
one of the situations most often encountered by today's graduates is checking concrete work done in the 1960s and 1970s when allowable stress design was the only method in use.
nowadays, we use ulitmate strength design and when checking work from those bygone days cannot match nor verify what was done. in many cases, it is easy to go back through an old concrete book or even aci 318-83 and find asd examples. however, in your case you should check that the tables and graphs in use were based on asd or usd and then work from there.
on the assumption that this might be the problem, look up some old codes and check your situation.
good luck.
regards,
qshake
eng-tips forums:real solutions for real problems really quick.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
wheel load on slab-on-grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 08:40 PM
slab-on-grade w embedded rails huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:30 PM
slab on grade problem huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:24 PM
how to thicken an existing concrete slab on grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:54 PM
grade beam detail question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:57 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:38 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多