几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 08:56 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 7 day concrete strength

7 day concrete strength
is there a formula for estimating the 28 day compressive strength of concrete based on the 7 day result?
with the caveats that all mixes are different, some are intentionally designed to achieve strength slower or faster than typical, and that the temperature can have a noticable impact on the relationship-
for a typical "run of the mill" mix we start to get concerned if we see much less than 60% of specified 28 day strength at 7 days. i am accustomed to seeing the 7 day strengths at about 2/3 of the 28 day test as a rule of thumb.
here is a typical formula for calculating strength based on time for "normal" concrete. you have to know the design or expected f'c. t is time in days since the concrete was cast.
f'ci= f'c*(t/(4.00+0.85t))
if you don't know the f'c, back into it using the 7-day break value. then use that f'c value to calculate your 28-day strength. my real world experience is that it is a decent estimate.
charlierock,
many spec's set a "specimen age correction factor" to predict the 28-days compressive strength from the results obtained at an older or younger age.
the most commonly used factors are :
age factor (multiply by)
--- ------
3 2.5
7 1.5
28 1.0
90 0.85
360 0.75
provided that the conditions of curing and testing are kept constant. interpolation could be made for other ages but this will increase the deviation from the true strength.
i’ve used these correction factors in my day-to-day business and found it to be kind of reliable especially for type i portland cement. note that this is only an estimate; nothing will give you the exact 28-days strength as there are too many variables. i’ve seen concrete that failed at 28-days though predicted to pass, there's a reason why it's called mean compressive strength.
also this gives no indication of the true compressive strength at the site and generally will yield a higher strength than the true one (depending on temperature, curing and type of cement)
drop by !!
in my 22 years construction experience, i agree with mmot & bluesman. 7 day strength should be 2/3 of 28 day value
charlierock...the estimates provided are good for type i portland cement. with all the blends and mix contortions the ready mix suppliers use to save a few bucks, these correlations can sometimes be off a bit.
if your mix has any proportion of ground blast furnace slag cement in it (newcem or similar), then you can expect the 7-day strength gain to be significantly lower than predicted or expected by correlations for plain type i. the 28-day strengths will not be significantly affected, but the strength gain is slower than with plain type i cement.
fly ash causes a similar slowing of the strength gain, though less pronounced because it is usually used in smaller proportions.
ask the ready-mix supplier for a strength gain curve for their mixes. this should get you where you want to be in your predictability.
if the concrete was supplied from a batch plant, the thing you should ask for is the "age-strength correlation" not the strength gain curves, as the former will give a better estimate of the predicted strength based on the true 28days strength using different q/c systems such as the cusum which most of the concrete suppliers use to predict the 28-days strengths based on the 7-days strengths and this correlation is checked and updated daily as the actual 28-days strengths becomes available by comparing them to the predicted ones.
but....i won't totally trust data provided by the concrete supplier .... re
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
7 day concrete breaks higher than 28 days huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:55 AM
30mpa parking garage concrete slab vs. 35mpa huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:39 AM
3000 psi concrete requiremen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:39 AM
28 days compressive strength of concrete in russian concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:34 AM
28 day vs. 56 day concrete breaks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:34 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多