几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 08:45 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 4 story wood building with steel beams and columns at the fi

4 story wood building with steel beams and columns at the fi
i am designing a large 4-story wood residential building with wood stud walls and wood truss floors. the half of the building at the first story is parking garage, framed with steel columns and beams which support the wood structure above. my question: is the steel frame needed to be braced by itself, such as using moment frame? since the floor truss will sit on the top of the steel columns and beams, i am concerned that if the steel frame can be braced by the plywood floor diaphragm above. any comments appreciated, thanks in advance!
if you are asking about span bracing, the wood trusses and flooring will suffice. if you are asking about overall lateral load resistance, you'll have to either use a moment frame or provide some type of shear wall/ cross bracing.
i agree with ron here, but i am surprised that the first floor is not pt. depending on the footprint, and the larger the better, pt should be more economical.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
thanks for your reply, ron. my question is about the stability of the whole steel frame. the overall lateral load resisting system of the building will be the wood stud shear walls in other parts of the building. my concern is that if the lateral loads acting on the steel frame can be transferred to the wood shear walls by the floor diaphragm since the diaphragm and the steel frame are separated by the floor trusses. if i use moment frame or cross bracing for the steel frame, the building will have two different lateral load resisting systems and i have to use the smaller r value, i don't know if i really need to do that.
hi, msquared48, what is pt? you mean pressure treated wood? thanks
pt is post-tensioned concrete.
it would have to be a huge residence for pt to be economical, i would suggest a normal reo slab would be more functional for the builder, he probably get the same guys to do the 1'st floor that he will get to do the sog.
when in doubt, just take the next small step.

the floor is 3/4" plywood sitting on the wood trusses or i joists. concrete is not an option.
fire resistance??
if this is a residence, unless it is bill gates' house, pt will not be more economical.
however, if it is a decent-sized multi-family "residence", you should consider replacing the first floor framing with pt.
whatever works though...
mike mccann
mmc engineering
have seen a lot of this type of construction using precast hollowcore concrete plank at first floor above grade...then wood construction up from there.
neffers
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:47 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多