几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 04:58 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 unbraced bottom flange length

unbraced bottom flange length
dear all,
is there min beam to beam girder depth ratio that allows you to assume that beam girders bottom flange is braced in case of negative bending?
i have a case that my beam girders are 33in deep and the beams are only 16in.
thanks
check out our whitepaper library.
my engineering judgment tells me that the bottom flange is not braced. if you are in a bind, and can't add diagonal bracing from the bottom flange to the beam framing in, then...
you could check the web of the beam bending like a plate (weak axis bending). the force applied at the bottom flange would be the bottom flange buckling force (2% of the bottom flange axial force would be some engineers' estimate). the moment in the web would be this force times the distance between the bottom flange and the bottom of the connection angles at the beam framing in.
daveatkins
i agree with daveatkins, i would not consider the bottom flange braced without some further investigation in this situation.
fwiw: another idea i have used, is to use a full height stiffener plate as both a single shear connection plate for the beam coming in, and to brace the bottom flange of the girder.
in a lot of stability articles i've read, and from a seminar by dr. joe yura at texas, i know that if you prohibit beam rotation, that is actually more effective in bracing the beam against ltb than by simply laterally bracing the compression flange.
the connection between the intersecting beams and the girder may or may not help in resisting rotation of the supporting girder. one method of achieving this is to extend the connection through to the bottom flange such that any rotation would be effectively resisted by the connection. now this would also probably require pretensioned bolts in the connection but even with pure bearing connections, the small slip might be allowed and still offer enough stiffness and strength to resist ltb.
you can check the girder with the beam providing torsional bracing. this is in appendix 6.3 of the new aisc 360-05 code.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
cantilevered beam backspan- unbraced beam length huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:42 PM
bottom loaded wide flange huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:30 PM
bottom flange bracings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:29 PM
bottom flange bearing on steel beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:29 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:13 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多