几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:35 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 gymnasium running track deflections

gymnasium & running track deflections
hello,
i've got a 120'x108' gymnasium. the roof joists span 108'. there is also a 10' wide running track on the inside perimeter of the gym hung from the joists every 21'-8" to 24'. the joists are spaced at 12'o.c., with each end where the track is parallel with the joists, the joists are spaced to match up with track below.
when the joist is parallel with the track, the track is hung from an individual (or double) joist(s) at 4 equally spaced points along the joist. when the track is perpendicular to the joist, the support is about 10' in from the building's perimeter.
not having run dealt with this situation before, i think my primary concern is deflection of the track, especially where the joist and track are parallel as the track will be influenced by the full deflection of the joist.
so, my thought is that i should determine what amount of movement i will allow in the track due to live loads, then translate that in to an allowable deflection for my joist. i was originally thinking of about 1/2 inch in the track, equating to about l/2160 in the joist which seems a bit extreme for a 108' joist. is this general approach valid? is 1/2 live load deflection too conservative?
i'll be happy supply additional details, though right now i'm thinking about this problem in more general terms. my thinking goes that if i determine a realistic deflection for the track, the question of joist layout will solve itself.
thanks,
erik
i've designed a number of buildings as you've described. i double up the joists where the track runs parallel with the joists and hang the track from each joist where the track is perpendicular. i support the track at approximately 10' on center in both directions (12' shouldn't be that much difference). the 10' on center allows me a place to connect a continuous handrail around the track at each hanger location. i've never had a problem with excessive track deflection or roof deflection. it sounds to me like you are on the right track.
i just look at it seperately. start with the running track with live load/total load deflection you need. then you will have a point load at the roof joist consisting dead and floor live load. then design the joist/beam with that point load+roof dead and live load.
few points to ponder:
1. i like to caution you to check the vibrations from human impact due to running. sji does not require you to check vibrations on roof joists while they require it for floor joists!
2. the deflection at the track will be calmative. you will need to add he track deflection to the joist deflection!
3. i read that the joists will be spaced 12 foot on center! or is that only spacing for rood joists that will support the track? if the roof joists will be spaced at 12 foot on center, you need to select proper deck.
regards,
lutfi
lutfi - you read correctly, joists are at 12'oc. i'll be using 3", 18 gage deck. per your other comment, the cumulative deflection is what concerns me - a small deflection for the joist is not small for the running track.
ahh.. now i kinda understand it now. you only have to add the live load deflection of the roof to the track right?
coengineer - yeah, actually 42psf snow, but that's correct. live load on the track will cause some deflection, and snow load on the roof will cause some deflection.
two years ago i was involved in the evaluation of an existing structure similar to yours. here are general background documents that i found useful:
modern steel construction, march 2001
i just finished the design of a building similar to yours. i did a vibration analysis of the channel at the edge of the track, as well as the steel beams i put in the roof to hang the track from. if you do a vibration analysis, you may find that you need stiffer
have you considered designing the running track with a camber? from a visual standpoint, a camber is more desirable than an excessive deflection.
if i re
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
floor deflections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:42 PM
deflections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:03 PM
calculating rho prime for long-term deflections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:03 PM
seat track extrusion - bac1520-841 huangyhg 精密机械 0 2009-09-06 09:20 AM
Unicode、UCS、UTF、BMP、BOM huangyhg vc编程 2 2007-01-22 05:43 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:39 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多