几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 11:12 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 load take downs

load take downs
how do you guys like to do your load take downs?
do you use fem software, equivalent frame models or just do it by hand using tributary areas ?
i have been doing it by hand but i'm considering using safe. just stripping down the architectuals and importing the floor plans in an assigning the relevant propeties.

using fem software makes the assumption that the whole structure is built in one operation. it does not allow for construction sequence.
if there are transfer members or large variations in framing stiffness, the fem takedown will often be very wrong, especially for transfer
by hand... using computer beam solutions where appropriate and integrating the solutions.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
we're doing it by hand here..
thanks for the responses.
i do them by hand prior to running any computer simulations.
this allows for very basic checking of the model, making sure the model is basically correct, prior to a more in depth look at the
i never do load run down's by hand these days. mostly i use the reaction output from a computer package but i still have a speadsheet set out so i can quickly verify the reaction output if required.
i use safe or ram concept for computing tributary areas on complicated floor plates where columns are all over the place. i import the cad model into ram, and assign a load of 100 psf and get column reactions. load / reaction gives me tributary area for each column. i use this in a spreadsheet to calculate total building loads for all floors with appropriate load combinations and verify gravity loads from the lateral analysis model.
why make things any more complicated than they need to be? hand take downs can be easily checked by hand, fem take downs are more complex to check.
i agree with rapts comment, sometimes you need to take worst case scenario in some areas.
you can use acad to set up and measure trib areas. this is approximate but everything with concrete is somewhat approximate.
i won't depend much on fem output from safe, etabs or any other unless i 'spot check' typical and non-typical conditions by hand.
we have a spreadsheet setup for load take down but, we would like to compare the results of fem load reaction by hand. using customized spreadsheet may be a great time-saver.
caution: you may not get a proper load reaction from fem anaysis unless the floor is 'properly meshed'
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
load distribution to three supports due to concentrated load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:04 AM
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
load bearing wood walls - live load reduction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:59 AM
live load reduction two way slabs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:51 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:54 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多