几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 12:38 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 pipe crushing load

pipe crushing load
i am working on a stacking of concrete cylinder piles four high. i am trying to make sure that the piles in the bottom row do not crush from the load above. can you suggest me any equation to check this condition. the piles will be supported on wood dunnage.
check out our whitepaper library.
look in the first site below, under pipes -> long.line loads -> 2 loads on dia.
prex
other options: check with the manufacturer, look in roark's formulas for stress and strain, which should have similar info to the xcalcs.
i am getting reasonable moment on the section. now the next point is what will be the length of the resisting section for this moment? thanks-
please elaborate: aren't you in a condition of longitudinally distributed line load (stacked pipes parallel to each other)?

prex
i would analyze the circle as a fixed-fixed beam with a length equal to the diameter. these fixed end moments are equal to pl/8. if the resisting moment of the plain concrete exceeds the pl/8 moment, you shouldn't see any cracks. the value of p is equal to the weight of the stack above the beam. you could be much more exact, but why bother?
prex, the piles are not continuously supported. they will be resting on timber pads at 18'-0" intervals. can the entire 18' be considered providing resistance?
are subsequent higher piles also supported at 18' intervals? if so, then the bearing capacity of the concrete compared to the load/dunnage area will govern. no flexure except self weight.
shin25fff">,
what i can suggest is that you use the 45° rule to determine the width of the resisting section. as the maximum bending moment is at 90° from the concentrated load, section width (or resisting length) would be πdfff">/2, dfff"> being the mid wall diameter.
it's a rough method, but is the only one excluding fem, and can tell you if you are comfortable in a safe condition or not.
prex
i think 45 degree rule may be more appropriate. but, i do not think that 'n' in nd/2 is applicable as the supports are right top of one another. therefore, the load has a chance to distribute only over a total width of one pile dia plus the width of the dunnage.
thanks all.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
moving point load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:22 PM
load testing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:14 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
deflection and tensile stress in pipe huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:49 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:29 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多