几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 09:00 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 seismic lookup by zip code

seismic lookup by zip code
i have found these two sites to be useful:
lookup seismic data by zip code (per usgs)...
note that these values are from 1996 usgs maps which are the basis for both the ibc 2000 and ibc 2003.
the ibc 2006 as well as other codes which have adopted the new maps in advance (i.e. georgia is still under ibc 2000 but has adopted the new maps) use the usgs 2002 data. this data has not yet been posted by zip code but may be used with latitude and longitude than can be found by zipcode as described below.
note that this data is still useful in ibc 2000/2003 situations in that the new maps can be an indicator of what a "site specific" study by a geotech might provide. reason being that similiar attenuation equations etc. used by geotech's to calculate accelerations were implemented in part to make the 2002 maps.
willisv,
i knew these maps were going to change for the ibc 2006 but didn't know where to find it. this is good information to have. i'm going to bookmark these pages too.
thanks for the info!
-mike
the tiger maps by the u.s. census also provide latitude and longitude for map locations.
willsv,
you said the usgs 2006 data can still be useful with the ibc 2000/2003 situations. do we have a choice, or what?
thanks,
-mike
mike,
the usefulness comes into play in that the usgs 2002 data can be used to provide yourself with an estimate of what a geotech might provide for ss and s1 with a site specific study (i.e. get a preview of what reduction might be possible prior to actually paying for the study). we have no choice as to what we can use - whichever one the governing code in the state in question references.
willisv,
thanks for the info!
-mike
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
relevancy of code date-opinions sough huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:51 PM
no code adopted huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:27 PM
is code of practice bs8110 seismically compatible huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:27 PM
icc code article cause for concern huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:00 PM
ibc seismic question 9again0 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:53 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:00 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多