几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 09:46 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 shear of wood to concrete

shear of wood to concrete
outside of the mu factor for the interstitial shear, does anyone have any test results for the lateral (longitudinal) shear value of wet-set wood sill plates on a concrete foundation wall (no anchor bolts or holddowns).
the reason i ask, is that i have a project in one of the areas damaged by a december storm on the washington coast - an older house with no anchor bolts in the foundation. it appears that the house has been slightly shifted to the side off the concrete wall. the structure saw sustained 100 to 120 mph winds for three days straight, with higher gusts.
the insurance company is maintaining that the damage is due to settlement, which, to me, is ridiculous in relation to the lateral slip - transverse to the foundation wall. they are basing this movement on cracks in the foundation (uncovered) and refuse to pay the claim to date.
i would like to be able to put some tangible numbers together based on the current ibc code wind design parameters to include in my report.
thanks in advance to all.
mike mccann
mccann engineering

i will have to think about this one. on the surface it seems the only thing preventing sliding, would be friction between the wood and concrete.
one of the first things i would do is determine the number of anchor bolts that would be required to meet the current code. that might give you a starting point to get a feel for the resistence without anchor bolts.
then i would look at how overstressed those bolts would have been under sustained loads of 100-120 mph winds. the numbers may be such that you can make a pretty good case, that even if the house meet current code it still would have substain wind damage.
you also might want to contect simpson strong tie. they have done a lot of testing on hold downs, and may have done some without anchor bolts.
when calculating the slip resistance, you may also want to consider wind uplift. that would reduce the normal force on the wood/concrete interface and lessen the friction.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM
beam shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:57 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多