几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:08 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 sheartension capacity of rebar

shear/tension capacity of rebar?
i think is this probably a stupid question, but i'll be damned if i can't figure it out or find it anywhere in my texts. i think it would simply be as x fy. but that seems too simple. i guess maybe you need to multiply by a phi value as well...0.7, 0.8?
i am asking because i am trying to determine the pull out strength of a rebar grouted into rock, as well as the shear capacity of that same rebar, grouted into rock. what about a bolt, threaded rod, etc...? same idea as rebar?
it's been a long week....
it is shear, so the ultimate shear stress is not asfy but 0.6fy, also i think there is a shear lag factor of 0.6, then you multiply it by phi.
usually dowels are limited by bearing with the concrete rather than shear.
what is the situation?
i would think the bond between the grout and the rebar and the grout and the rock would be the key.
don phillips
there are simple interaction formulas for combined shear and tension in this type of situation.
my ramset anchoring book gives this:
n*/phi_nu + v*/phi_vu < 1.2
there are non-linear interaction formulas too.
as noted by the other posters, you are unlikely to fail the bar.
on page 5 of the 2006 simpson anchor catalog, there are notes for the allowable shear and tension capacity for rebar that they use. you should be able to find the catalop online.
the situation is a concrete retaining wall that is supported on rock and i am trying to justify decreasing the width of the foundation by tying into the rock with grouted rebar to take up tension loads caused by overturning moment and shear loads from sliding. we have a detail showing #9@18oc with "kelgen gold" grout, but i can't find anything on kelgen, which makes me think it's a really old detail, and i'd lke to verify why #9's are ok.
but more than just that i am trying to learn how this actually works, and to find the "correct" way to determine these types of things. i am somewhat of the loan structural engineer in my office and there isn't anyone in to discuss this kind of stuff with, so i am forced to figure it out on my own and it can be quite daunting at times. thank gooodness for the internet.
i would use 0.6fy for the shear yield of the rebar. you may need some additional data to make sure your rock won't crush or spall before the rebar can reach yield.
i forgot yo mention, the 0.6 coefficient is not a safety factor. you will need to apply a safety factor on top of the 0.6.
for shear yield, i would "start" with 0.4fy for billet, a615-85.
i emphasize "start", since, as previously stated, this is a coeff, not a safety factor. also i am basing my "start" coefficient on aisc 9th 5-148, f4, which is for carbon steel, not for rebar. to my knolwedge there is not a specification for shear in rebar. why? i don't know! threrfore, if i were to do this, proceeding with caution, i would compare my results with that of mechanical fastener specification and design manual data.
so, to elaborate on the original question, how do mechanical fastener manufacturers, come up with shear values? i.e. powers fasteners specification and design manual, 5th edition p. 189.
i think you need to design this according to aci 318 appendix d.
first, factor your shear forces to get your design shear, vu.
your resistance, is this case, will be limited by the steel shear strength and the pryout shrength of the anchor.
the steel strength, phivs=phi*0.6*as*min(fu, 1.9fy)
for astm a615 gr60 rebar/ phi=0.65, fu=90 ksi, fy=60ksi
depending on your geometry, the shear strength could be limited by the pryout strength. the "nominal pryout strength" in shear is governed by eq d-28. to get the pryout strength, to get the pryout strength, multiply the "nominal pryout strength" by the phi factor covered in article d4.4c.
anchoring into rock is rather speacialized work and you might want to contact "williams" or another manufacturer that makes rock anchors. regardless of what the numbers say i would also do a pull test on a couple of installed anchors just to be sure the rock, grout & anchor are all working together as planned.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
greased rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 03:07 PM
flame cutting rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 12:15 PM
epoxy coated rebar huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 10:38 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
allowable bearing capacity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:51 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:48 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多