huangyhg

torsion on lvl beam supporting brick
i recently did an inspection on an 18 ft span beam lintel, most likely made of an lvl beam (drywall is still in place). the beam is supporting half of a 2nd story, roof and brick. the brick is supported on a steel angle which in turn is bolted to the lvl beam. the beam is currently at a deflection of l/300 and the brick facade has cracked. there is also slight twist of the steel angle.
the questions are:
1) is it allowed by code to support brick with a pre-engineered wood beam? (despite the fact that the criteria of l/600 deflection is respected). i could not locate on ibc2006 were this is addressed.
2) do you have a good reference on calculating strength of a wood beam due to excentric loading, such as brick?
3) in repairing the beam, should we simply replace the wood with a steel tube beam, which then would require steel columns...
any comments would be appreciated. thanks,
st
no, brick can not be supported by a combustible material (including wood). this was often done at setback gable roofs where the lintel was bolted to the bottom chord of the gable truss. this violates the ibc.
r703.7.3 masonry veneer above openings shall be non-combustible
so, no lvl beam is allowed at all on residential, to support brick? i suppose the steel angle would have to be designed so it is self supporting (i.e. not attached to the lvl)????
a fire treated wood would then be allowed?
in response to your question 2, i have designed lvl lintels to support brick veneer. more correctly, i have used psl lintels, because they come in a 5.25" width.
the torsion on a rectangular shape = cm/at, where c is a coefficient which depends on the aspect ratio of the rectangle, m is the torsional moment, a is the area of the rectangle, and t is the length of the smaller side of the rectangle. this shear stress is added to the shear stress due to direct shear, and the total shear stress is compared to the allowable shear stress (for example, 290 psi for psl).
but i have found the difficult part of designing a header for torsion is the end connection. usually, several lag screws are required to transfer the torsion from the header to the king stud.
daveatkins
dave has nailed the answer. look closely at the end connection. the torsion has to be developed.
so the question is, from a code point of view, is it allowed to use a psl? how did you justify using a psl vs the fact that combustible material is not allowed as lintel material?
there is nothing in the ibc that i can see that prevents masonry from being supported on a steel ledge angle which is bolted to an lvl beam. (except fireplace mansonry) solid blocking at the ends of an lvl lintel should be provided regardless of whether the lvl is eccentrically loaded or not. torsional restraint at the ends of beam can be easily resolved into a force couple at the top and bottom of beam. blocking may be evaluated based on the calculated restraint force.
one caveat is that there are lvl manufacturer recommendations that there be a moisture barrier between the masonry mortar and lvl. i suppose this is to prevent degradation of wood fiber and lamination bond at the point of bearing.
hope this is helpful.
lobstateata, that is what i was inclined in believing, but i could never find anyone to point out clearly an answer.
so, do you all know how to evaluate the torsional deflection resulting on a wood or psl beam?
by torsional deflection, i assume you are referring to the resulting rotation at mid-span? torsional stresses due to warping requires information about the full length of the member, the boundary conditions on the member and the variation of loading along the length of the
wait a minute - keep in mind that the ibc doesn't apply here.
this is a residential house - therefore irc applies. also, the irc allows brick veneer to be supported on steel angles attached to wood studs for instance (see figure r703.7.2.1).
supporting from a psl (lvl or other) composite lumber should be ok provided the following:
1. the wood beam is designed for long term deflections and limited to l/600 or 0.3" (per aci 530).
2. the brick sits directly on a steel angle and not on the wood itself.
3. the resulting torsion is taken into account (per daveatkins above)...and also considered for the design of the supporting end posts.

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]