几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 08:45 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 when does a building need to be brought up to current code

when does a building need to be brought up to current code?
i have been working on an addition to a warehouse. the existing building is a rigid frame with z-purlins. today, the client informed me that they were removing the roof from the existing building and replacing it. does this mean i need to bring the roof framing up to current code? under what conditions must an existing building be upgraded?
thanks
if your using ibc 2003, see chapter 34. if what they are removing is not structural and they are replacing with like kind...no problem. if not like kind, then as long as you don't increase the load in any member by more than 5%..no problem. if you discover that a structural component is deficient, during the repair, that
forgot to add....if the load in a
thank you for the code reference twinnell. here's a follow up question for you:
section 3403.2 states "where repairs are made to structural elements of an existing building, and uncovered structural elements are found to be unsound or otherwise structurally deficient, such elements shall be made to conform to the requrements for new structures."
what is the definition of "structurally deficient"? i believe that this building conformed to the code that applied at the time it was built, but calculations show that the purlins and the rigid frame do not meet the current code. does this make them "structurally deficient"?
structurally deficient in terms of the original building code. or deficient by engineering judgment. for example, if you see steel that is highly corroded or steel connections that appear to be grossly inadequate. you don't have to check every
the september 2006 issue of structure magazine had an article that will provide some additional insights.
i found this portion of the article interesting:
florida building code has a full volume that addresses existing structures. i found it to be valuable. while not complete and comprehensive, it is a start.
you may take a look at on line. it may help. here is the link to viewing it:
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
uk building code huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 04:49 PM
relevancy of code date-opinions sough huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:51 PM
no code adopted huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 04:27 PM
icc code article cause for concern huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:00 PM
ada, osha and code violations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:09 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:55 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多