几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 03:07 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 beam to beam moment connection

beam to beam moment connection
you have two beams framing into a girder, one on each side. the two beams are in line. one beam is a cantilever fastened with a moment connection to the girder. can the other beam be a simple shear connection or does it have to be a moment connection? i have seen it designed both ways. it has been said that since the other beam frames into the girder opposite the moment connection, that beam will stiffen the girder enough to resist the torsion created by the cantilever. can anyone tell me if this is true or what is industry standard. where can i find literature on this?
most of the time we put a moment connection on both sides of the girder.
check out our whitepaper library.
i think it depends on how you deal with the moment at the end of the cantilever.
if the main girder is designed to resist the vertical reaction plus the torsion from the cantilever, then the other connection may be 'pinned'.
if however the main girder is designed to carry the vertical reaction only, and you are relying on the second beam
depends on your connection. if you put that moment connection, then it will be a cantilever with the backspan on it. personally, i would put the moment connection and call it a day.
oh yea, i think you're deflection will be higher if you don't make it a moment connection because that beam will rotate if it has nothing to pull it back. someone correct me if i'm wrong.
both connections must be moment connections if your girder is a wide flange. wide flanges have almost zero torsional stiffness so having the cantilever beam fixed to the girder, with the opposing beam pinned, will depend on torsional stiffness you don't have.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
beam support along edge huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
beam design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:52 PM
aisc 13th ed. and cjp dw moment connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:27 AM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:37 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多