几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:15 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 camber for two way slab

camber for two way slab
does anyone have any guidelines for the determination of camber for a two way slab. i have seen it done but i have not personally done it. i cannot find it in a code or any other reference that i had. i would have thought that the long-term calculated deflection value would be suitable at mid-slab.
it depends on what you want the precamber to achieve.
is there brickwork or other brittle finishes that will be damaged by deflection of the slab. in this case precamber will do nothing to reduce the deflection experienced by the brittle finishes.
if it is simply to reduce the visible long term deflection, normally you would not prrecamber by more than the short term dead load deflection.
i guess, what you ask, is actually part of my question. why did "they" precamber the slab? most likely just to have a flat condition at the start of live load application. this would be a similar case to using cambered owsj. as you noted, the cambering will have nil effect of finishes etc. and i think that this was not the reason "they" cambered the slab.
so you think that the immediate dead load deflection would be enough? is this stated in a code that you know of?..or some other reference text?
thanks
dave
if you camber the slab then your depth when the slab is cast will be different in the middle than at the ends, at least until you have enough concrete in place to make up for this. it seems like that would give them trouble in the field casting and finishing the slab and that you may lose some of your effective depth. i don't have experience with this, but these problems come to mind.
dave
camber is not limited by any codes i know of. it's use is a "design/engineering judgement" decision, not something that needs to be limited by a code. theoretically you can use any amount of camber you want as long as you maintain the deflected shape within the code limits at all times.
having a flat condition at the time of application of live load is not a code judgement and is probably not achieveable unless you know the time of application of the live load and calculate deflections at that time due to the dead loads and long term effects. there is software that can do this for you but why would you want this?
the main use of precamber is to limit the long term visible deflection and ponding deflection on exposed slabs.
re the comment on thinner slabs, when precambering, the contractor should ensure that the slab thickness is maintained. both the top and bottom surface of the member are supposed to be precambered. simply precambering the bottom and maintaining a flat soffit is not logical.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
camber for steel beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:15 PM
basketball court slab on grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:40 PM
basement slab on grade design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:34 PM
banded tendons in one-way slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:15 PM
as3600 concrete strength for slab on ground huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:53 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:48 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多