几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 02:15 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 banded tendons in one-way slab

banded tendons in one-way slab
can you put banded tendons in a one-way slab or is it normally just distributed tendons in one direction for a one-way slab. in a two way slab it is normally distributed tendons in one direction and banded tendons in the perpendicular direction, right?
check out our whitepaper library.
banded-distributed is for two-way slabs. distributed tendons take the load one direction and the bands take it in another.
it is better to use distributed tendons than banded tendons in a one way slab. you have a more uniform distribution of prestressing force.
banded tendons are not used in a 1 way slab. there is no column/middle strip and hence there are no strong or weak bands. there would be tendons running flat perpendicular to the spanning direction in order to provide the minimum prestress required to prevent cracking. otherwise bonded reinforcement in this direction can be provided.
for two way slabs the tendons can be banded in one or both directions. i typically use banded tendons in both directions. this uses slightly more pt compared to the one way banded direction but provides steel where it is most required i.e. in the column strip and over the columns. it also provides better deflection performance and allows a reduced slab depth - the bands acting as a grillage of sorts.
bertiskorny,
why would you want to? the banded/distributed layout is a simplified layout used for flat slabs (slabs with pure 2way action) to make them easier to construct with unbonded tendons. there is no logic for its use in pone way slabs. as pappyirl says, the better solution even for those two way flat slabs is to use a two way banded layout but it is often harder to install with unbonded tendons.
pappyirl
if you use 2 way banded and distributed, why do you end up with more pt? the same total is used in each direction, except for the minor reduction in drape available because of clashes.
on what basis do you reduce the slab depth in this case? the grossly unconservative assumptions (pti/aci) used in the standard banded/distributed flat slab layout using average moment design are hard to beat using proper two way flat slab slab design theory.
pappyirl,
i have never heard of banded in both directions, is that safe? what do you do when there is a point load towards the middle of the slab?
banded in both directions is not permitted by aci 318. read section 18.12.4, which limits the spacing in one direction to not exceed 5' or 8*slab thickness
i think terminology is the problem, and that neither pappyirl or rapt is saying that you should have no tendons in the middle. i think they mean that it is best to put more in the column strip, which just makes sense.
also i believe that neither pappyirl or rapt are based in the us and therefore are not necessarily limited by aci requirements.
by banded in both directions, i mean a proper 2 way distribution with distributed tendons in both directions loading bands in both directions.
basically 50% of the load is carried in each direction by the distributed tendons and these distributed tendons are then supported by banded tendons picking up the distributed tendon load and carrying it to the supports. thus 100% is carried in each direction. but then, the 50% distributed in each direction can be modified as long as the respective bands are modified accordingly. so the distributed could be split 70/30 as long as the banded is split 30/70, still giving 100 in each direction.
the us one way banded distributed system is one extreme of this where the distributed % is 100/0 and the banded % is 0/100, thus still carrying all of the load in each direction.
100% banded tendons in both directions was proposed and used in europe in the 70/80's (definitely in the netherlands but possibly in other countries as well). in this case, the middle strip is reinforced with passive reinforcement. costs more but easier installation. i was asking my questions of pappyirl to see if this was what he was suggesting.
concrete slabs work the same way in all countries, simplistic (and sometimes dangerous) code rules often limit people who know what they are doing from designing a slab in the best way possible. the rigid rule in aci allowing banded/distributed or 75/25% distributions only is stupidly restrictive to designers who usderstand slab design (not simply how to apply some code rules).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
as3600 concrete strength for slab on ground huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:53 PM
analysis of concrete slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:35 AM
add steel base plate for new column to existing post-tension huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:10 AM
adapt p huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:10 AM
adapt pt design philosophy huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:09 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:00 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多