几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:31 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 chicken wire wind pressure

chicken wire wind pressure
is anyone aware of testing done for drag coefficients for chicken wire fencing? asce 7 seems to agree with hand calcs based upon reynold's number, using the width of a single wire and the opacity (% solid area) of the mesh. however, i have been warned by another engineer that it would be typical to take up to 6 times the actual profile area to account for turbulence. much thanks...
check out our whitepaper library.
i had an old friend of mine once show me a picture of a typical airplane wing cross section as compared to a small dot next to it representing a thick wire. he claimed that the wire produced as much drag as the wing.
we've designed lattice grids in the past where we reasoned that either the owner might someday add a nice banner to it or a large piece of plastic would blow onto it - so we designed it as a solid entity.
otherwise...would you design for, say, 50% effective area? just a thought.
thanks jae. if it were a small fence i would agree with your philosophy, but we've got thousands of square feet of mesh, with severe limitations on the supporting structure, so every tenth of a psf counts.
there is a manual that is published by the chain link fence institute. it is not chicken wire but the nearest thing that i can think of. the following link will take you to the site and you can download it. it is in pdf format.
wastruc10...if latitude available, i would take jae's approach, but it appears you don't have that latitude.
i would be careful about putting too much emphasis on the turbulence/supplemental drag issue. i believe those were developed with a "steady state" condition, rather than a "gust" condition. for the gust condition, a momentary large lateral deflection might be very acceptable, thus allowing a bit more range in your design.
further, the importance factor of such a structure need not be very high. in the florida building code, screen enclosures are to be designed for an importance factor of 0.77 (don't ask me why it isn't 0.75 or 0.80!).
hi wastruc10,
one should also consider the appropriate radial ice case on the mesh. total weight will also affect your connections.
regards
vod
whenever i've had to do a hydraulic loss calculation, i use the tables in the back of ashrae fundamentals books. they tabulate losses for all sorts of cases. for a screen in a duct with 90% free area the drag coefficient is .14
lutfi - we've checked the chainlink fence institute recommendations; appears to match asce 7. i wonder if this is based upon testing (?) or more likely they hired a consultant that used the code...
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
british wind loading codes huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:19 PM
asce simplified design wind pressure huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:23 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
added internal pressure to wind load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:11 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:36 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多