几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 11:41 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 concrete beam design

concrete beam design
i am not sure of your loading conditions for this grade beam supported on two footings, so i cannot give an opinion on which way would be the best way or required way to transfer the given loads. however, i can give a general response based on a general design of beams.
you can design it either way. which way depends on how you want and expect the beam to behave under loads. just make sure that you design the beam the way you analyze it. for example, a fixed-fixed beam would need to have adequate moment capacity at the ends and adequate ability to transfer the moment to the support. this condition, in turn, would affect the loads to design your support. a simple beam would need to have end conditions that allowed rotation and do not develop or transfer moment.
hope that helps.
~dison
consider the scale of costs:
-concrete and rebar are low cost
-manhours are expensive
-supervision is very expensive (complexity requires more supervision)
-mistakes are extremely expensive.
keep your design as simple as possible within the parameters imposed; this reduces the need for supervision and the possibility of mistakes in design and on site.
in general separate bases are less costly than combined bases and simply supported beams are less costly than beams with fixed end moments.
fixed end moments introduce extra cost and complexity into the beam and into the bases.
in general, complexity is only justified for external constraints such as limited space or architectural requirements.
good luck and welcome to the profession.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
beam design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:52 PM
asd - reinforced concrete beam design minimum reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:31 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:58 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多