几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 01:59 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 corbel or ledge

corbel or ledge?
i'm designing a sluice gate structure with a ledge(?) at the top of a deep reinforced concrete box. the ledge is about 20 feet long and will have two point loads occurring about 10 feet apart at the gate lift locations. my question concerns design method - should this be seen as a cantilever ledge or as two corbels? if designed as corbels, should i use the same closed stirrups as if they were isolated and not intrinsic to the continuous ledge?
any direction or suggestions appreciated.
-jack
find a job or post a job opening
i would treat them as two corbels with the point loads. can you do the corbel in structural steel as a 'bolt on'? might be cheaper. don't know the magnitude of the loads or the sizes required.
dik
design it as a beam ledge - this is analogous to girder ledges used to support precase double-ts. there is a design procedure outlined in pca notes on aci 318-0x building code. for the -05 version see p15-3 and example 15.3.
can we get a tie breaker?
dik
you should be able to design it either way. pca notes have examples of each methood. i might look at it as 2 corbels ignoring the adjacent concrete and then as a beam ledge, then compare the cost of construction of each way to make the decision. but yes, i would include all the ties if i treated it like corbels.
if the loads are not high and you have the constant ledge anyway, then it might be cheaper to go with the constant depth beam ledge. do you have a contractor on the project?
if they make the ledge the same profile throughout, and they misplace the loads relative to where the corbel ties were installed (or vice versa) there could be a potential problem. the more foolproof way might be to use the beam ledge concept since the corbels may not be isolated as they usually are.
dik, willisv, and haynewp,
i can't use structural steel for the corbel as i'll need the full length c.i.p. concrete ledge for a working platform for maintenance.
the loads are about 30k each vertical with no applied nu.
i have a copy of the pca notes on aci 318-02 which has examples of both methods. should have checked before posting.
i'm going to go with the ledge design.
thanks to you all for your help.
-jack
woohoo!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
corbel or cantilevered beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:59 PM
corbel beam design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:58 PM
concrete corbel questions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:54 AM
another concrete corbel question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:14 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:06 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多