几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 06:53 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ibc shear adjustmen

ibc shear adjustment
hi all,
the municipalities in our area are just starting to adopt the international codes, and as i am working on one project, i see something that baffles me. i was hoping one of you could help me understand. in table 2305.3.7.2 of the 2000 ibc there are adjustment factors for "shear walls with openings not designed for force transfer". the values i question are the values along the 0% full height sheathing line. if i have a 3'-4" tall window in a 10'-0" wall that extends the entire length of the wall, i get 100% of the tabulated shear value for the full length of the wall, and i don't have to design any force transer? this does not make sense to me, but it will make my architects very happy if it is right.
akastud
i think that row is there for interpolation purposes. you must still take the shear at the top of the shear wall and divide by the summation of lengths of full height segments, which meet the aspect ratio per code. so in your case, you would get an infinitely high shear per foot in at the base of the shear wall, which is unacceptable.
daveatkins
i read it different dave, from 2305.3.7.2 it says "the total shear capacity, pounds, shall be equal to the adjusted shear capacity (table 2306.4.1 value times adjustmant table 2305.3.7.2 value), plf, times the sum of the widths of shear wall segments meeting the aspect ratio requirements" not sum of full height segments. therefore the situation i described would get the full shear capacity as if the wall had no window. am i misunderstanding it?
akastud
i would say that in the situation you described, you would have no shear wall segments - a shear wall segment must extend from story to story and meet the aspect ratios of table 2305.3.3.
that's what i would think to, however, the code says that 0% of the wall is full height sheathing. i am with you guys, i am just trying to reason what possibly the code writers meant. the aspect ratio is easy to meet in this case.
alastud
in the 2003 ibc %full height sheathing starts at 10% and not 0%. a revision bar is beside this area indicating change. hope this helped.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
does flexural reinforcement count for shear friction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:15 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM
beam shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:01 PM
base shear calculation fron ibc and asce-7 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:29 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:01 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多