几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 06:57 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 disproportionate collapse

disproportionate collapse
according to uk building regs. building over 5 storeys must be designed for disproportinate collapse. we are designing a 5 storey structure ( 1 is basement) but are thinking of designing the basement as contiguous piled wall with transfer deck and load bearing masonary above. because we have 4 storeys of brickwork would we still need to design for disproportionate collapse.

whether the regulations require it or not any structure should be designed to avoid disproportionate collapse. all it means is that there should be some redundancy in the system. e.g. if one column collapses the whole building should not fall down because the next one falls down and so on.
carl bauer
to answer pie's question - yes, the whole of a five-storey building needs to be designed against progressive collapse to comply with british building regs. this means that if you were thinking of loadbearing masonry carrying ordinary prestressed concrete planks, that probably won't do. you would need continuity in the floor plate to bridge a missing wall (by catenery or diaphragm action), or some complicated system of secondary beams and posts to do a similar job. much better to have a framed structure
on carl's wider point, where should we be drawing the line? most people would agree there's no need to consider progressive collapse for a two or three storey domestic building, and at the moment british regs require it for five or more storeys. progressive collapse got a lot of press in the wake of september 11, but i'm not convinced it was a real issue. after all, the towers did stand up for quite a while after the attack.
richard
wtc did stand up maybe even more than what would have been forecasted given the fire protection embedded.
i agree that the structure should be checked for disproportionate collapse as per the regulations. however, even though some may argue that this is actually a four storey structure, the designer should really consider the use of the building and the likely effect on the occupants of a partial collapse (whether 5 storeys or not). if there are likely to be large numbers of people in the structure then this check may be prudent on structures with fewer than 5 floors
andy machon
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
disproportionate collapse - masonryhollow core huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:57 PM
atlanta partial parking deck collapse huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:48 PM
another roof collapse huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:17 PM
another crane collapse in nyc huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:14 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:40 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多