几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 06:57 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 disproportionate collapse - masonryhollow core

disproportionate collapse - masonry/hollow core
we been asked to look into detailing to meet disproportionate collapse requirements for a building under construction. the building is 4 storey block of flats plus basement, approx 24x24m. external walls are cavity 100brick/75cavity/200mm solid block and internal walls 200mm solid block. hollow core slabs and stairs have been designed by pc manufacturer for all vertical loads. first two floors of slabs have been erected. i am concerned that no other provision has been made for disproportionate collapse. there will be a screed topping which can be reinforced. any thoughts, advice by anyone more familiar with connection possibilities would be appreciated.
check out our whitepaper library.
as i understand it you are building walls with two materials - structural brickwork, and concrete block with a cavity. concrete shrinks and brick swells.
when i faced this problem several years ago i started by contacting the brick manufacturers association - asking information on loadbearing structural brickwork. they were very helpful.
on the otherside i contacted the concrete block manufacturers association. they publish a helpful book and provide some handy downloads.
between those i've done a lot of reading building construction books, and looking up magazines like the structural engineer uk version.
there are no instant answers - particularly in a field like disproportionate collapse. there are several books published on the subject of structural collapse, but it is difficult to find appropriate previous examples which match the problem in hand.
most designers just stick to the current codes of practise because it can cost big bucks to cater for serious cases of disporportionate collapse.
johnp.rz
i assume this one is in the uk as you are referring to it as disproportionate collapse. in australia and the us it is referred to as progressive collapse.

if so, look up the building regs (not sure if it was london or uk), they referred to allowing for the removal of a certain area of party wall which had to be designed for.
it is primarily failure of the walls that will cause the disproportionate collapse. you can allow for this scenario by either:
1. providing a continous member under the floor edges that can span across any gap, or
2. incorporating a bond beam at each floor to provide a tie for arching action across any hole (or cantilever action at ends).
as for the floor immediately above any hole (i.e. all floors), you should provide tie bars between the ends of members to provide catenary action if the floor immediately below blows out. these tie bars can be placed in one of the cores at each end and grouted in. the concrete over the core can often be removed for the bar length to ensure adequate compaction of the grout (ckeck with manufacturer). a tension member around the perimeter may be a good idea also.
thank you both for replying.
csd72 - yes it is uk and the building regulations do apply. your comments and suggestions are all correct.
i was looking to provide horizontal and peripheral ties to cater for the tension forces required by the codes. my problem was detailing these in a way that they would be effective. the first 2 floors are already in place, so slabs rest on the 200mm concrete block inner leaf and wall above it has been built. similarly with internal walls. so providing continous/bond beams in no longer an option. there was a suggestion to utilise the screed topping but i would not have relied on this to provide any composite action - unless i m missing something. peripheral ties are allowed to be within ,say, 1m from edge, which would help the problem of the walls being already in place. this would mean providing ties on top of the slabs and then breaking into the cores at places to anchor them- does this sound feasible? or any other ideas?
how about a continuous angle around the perimeter for the pereter ties. connect this to the underside of the hollowcore and design it as a tension
yes, that is an idea. i was thinking of something along those lines and looking at tying slabs together with ms flat bar and anchoring into the cores with rebar. the angle idea has some advantages and could be buried in the screed. i also have a ceiling underneath so could hide any fixings.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
core drill concrete for testing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 02:00 PM
cmu block walls with hollow core slab - how high huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:29 AM
profile of a surface on a honeycomb composite core huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:21 PM
【转帖】profile of a surface on a honeycomb composite core yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:27 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:41 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多