几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:05 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 grating to transfer shear 9lateral load0

grating to transfer shear (lateral load)
i have a simple frame of w10 beams. a mechanical unit will rest on it. i am placing w-19-4 grating on the frame. there is very little lateral load coming from unit. what should i specify the contractor to do with grating and w10 joint so that i can assume that grating is acting as shear diaphragm?

two things to consider:
why do you want to use the grating as a shear diaphragm if there is very little lateral load?
does the grating manufacturer recommend their product for transferring in plane shear loads?
good luck.
i once contacted a grating manufaturer to see if the grating could be used to cut down the unbraced length of the beams. they said no way. i wouldn't count on the grating for any type of lateral stability.
i have always used angles placed diagonally under the grating to take lateral loads. usually just loose angles field welded to the underside of the top flange of the beams.
i'm not sure of your layout, but you can design the support beams to carry biaxial bending.
i agree with bbruins that grating doesn't provide much diaphragm shear values.
i would never use the grating in this fashion. there is no data that can be used to back up this utilization.
i normally add horizontal diagonals for bracing.
regards,
lutfi
agree with mwpc and lufti. use horizontal braces as required to stabilize the frame.
one further point. if you do use the grating in this fashion - how is anyone else going to know? you have a duty to inform future engineers who may need to modify your work.
horizontal bracing is a good idea as long as there are no conflicts with ducts that come out the bottom of the unit. sometimes they come out the side of the unit, but more often they come out the bottom. if there would be a conflict, i would then design the beams to handle biaxial bending like whyun says and omit horizontal bracing. this gives you heavier beams, but it's also easier to erect. i use knee braces on the posts, but you have to keep the work point at the bottom of the brace up far enough so that the roof penetration can be flashed with a boot. also, if your framing will be hot dipped galvanized bolted connections are prefered because welding through zinc is not recommended (although doable).
i assume this is a rooftop platform that you are doing. if my assumption is correct, another consideration is the height of the platform above the roof. you should leave enough space between the bottom of the platform and the roof surface so that when it's time to re-roof, workers can reasonably work under the platform to put the new roof down. depending on the size of the platform, roughly 3 feet is good. this could be less for a small platform.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
does flexural reinforcement count for shear friction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:15 PM
distribution of horizontal shear stree by bs8110, cl.5.4.7.2 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:01 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM
beam shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:22 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多