几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 wind loads for pipe racks, etc

wind loads for pipe racks, etc..
how would i go about finding the wind load applied on structures like pipe racks or other structures with bare steel skeleton? how would i apply this load? thanks.
find a job or post a job opening
if you use the asce 7, try the open structures equation and force coefficient tables. check the notes and commentary to see if there's any reason these should not apply to pipe racks.
there is a better document for this type of application. pip stc01015 structural design criteria, process industry practices (pip).
i have used the asce publication "wind loads and anchor bolt design in petrochemical facilities" in the past. i found the approach to be reasonable.
ditto jec67.
there is another asce report "wind load on petrochemical facilities" (i don't have the document handy, can't tell the verision and date).
a very important aspect in wind load calculation for piperack, i think, is that you need to consider the available width of the rack no matter the pipes are full or not on the rack for the current project. as per this report, you need to consider (d+0.1w)l as the loading area, where d is the maximum pipe diameter at one level, w is the piperack width, and l is the calculation length.
i am being told by the engeneer on my job that2- 2" rigid galvanized steel 4' 6" tall and concreted 24" into ground with 1' bases will not hold a 140mph wind load calc. can any one confirm this or recommend a site that will help me?
i have looked at other load calcs and found that it would, but they wont buy into it even after showing him the calcs.
he wants2- 4" rigid posts to mount rack.rack holds 1-20 space panel,lighting contactor,and time clock.
2" seems a small diameter for this large a wind load. this really should be looked at by a structural engineer. i don't see any big deal with using 4" diameter posts, if that makes the client happy.
explain in more detail what is being supported by the 2" post?
the problem with 4" rigid is the wieght.it would take 4 people to lift 2-4" rigid pipes even without the panels.
i dont know if you have ever tried to lift that size post by yourself.i do appreciate your comments it has been determined by engineer that 2.5 will carry 140mph wind load.
besides the cost of overkill,and wieght,the engineer only wanted to be safe ,not worry, and bypass calculating the right posts.
should we all over kill our specs and just keep them happy?
the panel is 30x20",a lighting contactor 10x10",and a standard time clock 6x10".
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
what wind loads on building canopy huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 08:36 PM
ransient loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 03:35 PM
emporary wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 01:09 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:00 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多