几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 06:31 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 restrained vs. unrestrained

restrained vs. unrestrained
folks,
recently there has been considerable debate in our office regarding whether the end spans/corner spans of post-tensioned flat slabs are classified as restrained or unrestrained.
refer a similar thread
in researching i find that there is considerable redistribution of moments in continuous systems due to the fact that negative steel remains cool in comparison to positive steel. also, there is a mention of tension membrane action. intuitively, i feel that the corner/ exterior columns provide axial and rotational restraint to a pt slab regardless of the presence of spandrel beams, but how does one quantify it and present it to a building official or a fire marshall?
does anyone have any experience in this regard for concrete buildings.
i note that a recent research (by troup et al.) concludes that most typically framed (with simple end connections) steel buildings are considered as thermally restrained.
thanks
does anyone have any opinions?
slickdeals - as you have found there is considerable literature on both side of the fence on this issue. you can find reputable resources that say the end bay is restrained as well as unrestrained. as far as i am aware there is no definitive guidance and i would follow what is considered the standard of care in your part of the country.
personally, i treat it as restrained just like the rest of the slab. reason being, it does not seem to make sense to classify an interior bay as restrained and the exterior bay as not restrained, when a fire at the interior bay (with less cover) could pop the same tendons that extend through the exterior bay (with more cover if designed as unrestrained) thus ruining the integrity of that bay.
slickdeals,
i think it gets down to the mechanics of how a slab works under fire.
for an internal panel, the bottom reinforcement capacity under fire is not as critical as, with as lot of redsitribution, the slab can work with no positive moment capacity and basically act as 2 cantilevers spanning to the middle of the span.
for a simply supported span, there is no negative capacity possible so the cover has to be increased on the bottom to keep the temperature down and allow the bottom steel to still work.
for an end span, you cannot develop much capacity or redistribute much moment to and end column, so the positive steel needs to provide some capacity so more cover is needed than the internal case. if the end column was very stiff, then you could develop moment there and so it could be treated like an internal span.
so it really depends how stiff the end column is.
in most cases i would think it would be ignored.
you then have the problem hinted at by willsv with unbonded pt that if the strand loses capacity in the internal span, what capacity does it have anywhere? i would say that this one has been missed by the code committees. everyone else in the world using bonded pt does not have this problem. maybe you should change to the better product!!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
restrained basement wall design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:31 PM
restrained and unrestrained assemblies in fire rating huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 06:30 PM
laterally unrestrained beams in buckling huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:00 AM
help - restrained vs unrestrained construction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 04:10 PM
datum shift on a restrained gdt par huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:45 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:25 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多