几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » ISO standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 07:27 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 standard formatting

standard formatting
is anyone familiar with an industry standard for typeface and font size in engineering documentation?
the iso/iec directives part 3 avoids this subject matter, as does the ieeee standards style manual. however, joan g. nagle's book 'handbook for preparing engineering documents'identifies 'the most commonly used body typefaces are times roman, century schoolbook, garamond, and bodoni.'
any advice or other sources to search?
auminer
check out our whitepaper library.
you may have better luck searching through ergonomics or human/interface design texts. from what i recall, the font size needs to make the height of the letters take up x number of degrees of the viewing area when viewed at the in-use distance. this is why road signs are so big. unfortunately i don't recall what x is supposed to be.
engineering drawings are to be created to ansi y14.2, line conventions and letterings.
ben loosli
cad/cam system analyst
ingersoll-rand
when i was doing my master's degree the recommended fonts for the thesis were either arial or times new roman.
there seems to be two formats to write reports in - times new roman font size 12 and arial font size 11. the uni i'm doing my master's with only accepts times new roman and hence what i'm accustomed to. however, there are arduant supporters out there for arial.
i'd like to know if your organizations have standardardized on a font type - or have felt that that was a minor item (to hard to tackle?)that distracts from the quality of the content of the document.
my research has suggested that documents that require time to read through should be in font similar to times new roman, and that shorter documents (including presentations) should be in arial.
any comments?
auminer
auminer,
in the uk, bs8888:2002 "technical product documentation(tpd) - specification for defining, specifying and graphically representing products" is now the definitive standard for all technical documentation. however, it's not perfect and appears to overlook the written 'technical report' style document entirely, concentrating on drawings:
this standard cross-references en iso 128 "technical drawings" (in dozens of sections) and also bs en iso 3098 "technical product documentation - lettering"
3098-0 part 0 - tpd lettering general requirements
3098-2 part 2 - tpd latin alphabet numerals and marks
3098-3 part 3 - tpd greek alphabet
3098-4 part 4 - tpd diacritical and other marks latin
3098-3 part 5 - tpd cad lettering of the latin alphabet
3098-3 part 6 - tpd lettering - cyrillic alphabet
part 5 refers to the font for drawings which is the basis for autodesks and others 'iso' font.
this font provides excellent clarity but can make large documents look like 'first steps in reading' kids books because the font is so unmistakable.
times roman fonts are not good for the clear reading of mission-critical text. (they were, when originally created by the uk times newspaper 100 years ago, but then the priority was to create the maximum size with minimum surface area = minimum ink use) i can understand a uni liking times because it provides an old look to modern documentation and minimised toner use in printers.
for clarity and ease of recognition, i suggest you as a company standardise on a typeface as the basis for a 'house style'. consistency in the appearance of documentation across a project is as important as the typeface used. it may sound beaurocratic, but half a day spent with project mamagers agreeing the format of text, titles and page layout can transform a big project from a load of disparate parts into a really superb cohesive whole.
i hope you can use some of these ramblings!
regards,
bob aka madmanxcadman
iso directives part 3 are now replaced by iso directives part 2:2001.
however, details such as font sizes etc. are automatic within the "iso template" that is now required for all iso work from dis (draft international standard) onwards. iso has a special website for standards developers:
if can amyone tell me where i can find free resources on engineering technical manuals standards?
many thanks for your help in advance
--amr
a portal to many "resources" may be found at
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
what are the guidelines to create a new standard huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 01:54 PM
datum reference style old new on y14.5m standard drawing huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:44 PM
【转帖】asmeb107.100-2002-b94.9-1999标准 huangyhg American standards 1 2009-09-01 09:28 AM
【转帖】what are the guidelines to create a new standard yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:13 AM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:45 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多