几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD/CAM/CMM » 精密机械
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 10:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 bolt strength reduction in shear lap joint with packer

bolt strength reduction in shear lap joint with packer
in a bolted lap joint subject to shear and including a non structural packer (greater then 15% of the bolt diameter) what is the method of analysis for the bolt stress?
consider the packer to be attached to one or the other of the joined members. that
thanks, the packers i am considering, are floating, i.e. not attached to either of the load carring plates.
i noticed previously that you specified initially that the packers are non-structural.
if you cannot extend the packer and add discrete fasteners to make it structural, use the second suggestion of my first post, and increase the total fastener strength by the amount of load which would be transferred in the case of a structural packer. that should cover the problem.
as an additional check, it would be wise to do a detail analysis of the fasteners, as there will be additional bending and prying, but adding capacity as described above should result in heavier and or stronger fasteners which can handle the extra eccentricity and resultant loads.
hope this helps.
regards,
lcubed
i've assumed so far that your packers are of structural material and the holes in the packers are not oversize clearance holes. if the packer material is not capable of picking up load, you must check the bolts by detailed analysis, but you should also re-think such a design if at all possible.
i was a little short of time when i wrote my last post, so i may have omitted some detail. since you mentioned that the thickness of the packer is >15% of the bolt diameter, it sounds as if you are using bruhn as a reference. is that the case?
bruhn is one source and 15% is derived from aircraft manufacturers old experimental data (so i believe),
i a looking for a research paper, experimental results aisc naca etc, where this subject is treated. to date i have not found an eloquent and comprehensive analysis of thick packers in bolted joints and it suprises me.
best advice is, try to change the design. if bolts are shear-carrying, the danger is that the shear load tips them instead of shearing, so after repeated load application there is local bearing failure in the outer leaves of the joint, and the under-head radius of the bolt is subject to prying loads. eventually there will be a fatigue failure and the bolt heads will be detached. to avoid this the bolt diameter will have to be increased disproportionately, resulting in a heavy and bad-looking design.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
more about bolt circles huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 11:47 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:42 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多