几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 11:47 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 more about bolt circles

more about bolt circles
the center of a bolt circle has a nominal (basic) location and a tolerance zone.
is the location of each hole measured wrt to basic location, or the actual location?
if gd&t is not used, is there are tolerance on the diameter of the bolt circle? if so, and there is an even number of holes in the pattern, must the holes lie within d+/-t, or d+/-2t?
if gd&t is not used, what prevents the tolerance zone of each hole from being computed as the sum of the positional tolerance of the bolt circle center + the tolerance of the bolt circle diameter?
i think you've been hanging around btrueblood too long.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter

mintjulep,
basic dimensions and gd&t:
the centre of the bolt circle is a figment of the drafter's imagination. it has no tolerance. each hole is located from the specified datums, which are required by asme y14.5m-1994 to be real features.
± dimensions:
i can define a pitch circle using the centres of three holes. this gives me a diameter and location to which we can verify tolerances. even the angle tolerances are verifiable. if there are more than three holes, all of this becomes ambiguous. this is an awful lot of work to avoid gd&t.
jhg
is there a difference between bolt circles and screw circles? just wondering.
perhaps 'politically correct' should be 'fastener locational circles' or such.

i've seen bc defined as both bolt circle and between centers, depending on the company standard. off topic again... time to go home.
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter

"if gd&t is not used, is there are tolerance on the diameter of the bolt circle? if so, and there is an even number of holes in the pattern, must the holes lie within d+/-t, or d+/-2t?
if gd&t is not used, what prevents the tolerance zone of each hole from being computed as the sum of the positional tolerance of the bolt circle center + the tolerance of the bolt circle diameter? "
well, what drawoh said.
yes, w/o gd&t, you could have a set of dimensions, each with their own tolerances, locating the position of the (center of) the bolt circle, relative to some other feature.
but, within the circle, the bolt holes are presumed to lie on the defined bolt circle +/- the circle's tolerance, and +/- any angle variation (usually confounded or double-dimensioned, as pointed out exhaustively elsewhere). in other words, the pattern as a whole (and thus the circle center) can shift from the controlling features, but the bolt holes relative to each other can only drift within the bolt circle tolerance.
now apply gd&t, and hold the pattern center fixed from the same features (now made "datums") using basic dimensions. how you tolerance the bolt holes relative to those datums affects how much tolerance you can allow within the pattern...something i tried to bring up long ago...and i believe ewh had the answer then, describing how you would control only one fastener hole's posisition (or perhaps the bolt circle's position? but this is a centerline, so you can't specify it as a datum in the 1994 version) relative to the datums, and reference the fastener hole (or bolts circle - pre 1994) as a new datum, and apply the within-the-pattern tolerance seperately to the remaining holes from that datum only. then spend a week explaining to various machinists what the %$$! your intent is, only to finish up with some 57-year old machinist telling you "the old way worked perfectly fine, why'd you go and mess it up".
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】geometry data for circles and lines with non-zero thicknes yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 11:11 AM
【转帖】controlling the tessellation of arcs and circles yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 06:09 PM
【转帖】olerances for basic dimensions, continued yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 10:53 AM
【转帖】new center circles tool yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 01:05 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:08 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多