几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 11:17 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 how to gage rr flatness

how to gage r&r flatness?
hi all,
one of our customers asks me to do the gage r&r on a sheet metal part. one of the critical requirements is flatness. we know that flatness (.008 inch) may be inspected by cmm(program and non-program) or manually with indicator. i thought that this may not a good idea to do the gage r&r because different people will hit different points/routes.
is someone can tell me the right way/method to perform this assignment?
check out our whitepaper library.
determine which method of evaluation you are going to use for measuring the part (usually the least expensive to you that has a good chance of meeting the requirements) and do the gage r&r with that method. the purpose of the r&r is to check gage capability which is why your customer probably requested it. if this is a key dimension for them, knowing you are capable of measuring it can save a whole lot of headaches down the road.
regards,
do not do an r & r study on flatness since the method of measuring is not repeatable. you are absolutely correct that each person does touch on different areas even if one had the 10 parts and 3 trials. what a mess!!!!
an r & r study is to test the gauge for appropriate application and in the automotive industry, the r & r value should be under 30% of the process depending upon how critical the feature or characteristic is.
on the flatness, we would have a larger portion of the results with the method of contact rather than the gauge. if you proceed with this study, expect something like about 75% r & r value with the gauge only contributing about 15% and the differing methods the balance or 60%.
as a matter of fact, do not perform an r & r study on most geometrical symbols but on linear dimensions.
tell you customer, r & r are taken on linear dimensions where the gauge family is used.
hope this helps.
dave d.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
flatness at mmc huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 10:43 AM
【转帖】straightness vs flatness yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 10:33 AM
【转帖】how to gage rr flatness yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:26 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:15 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多