几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 12:21 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 profile of a surface on a honeycomb composite core

profile of a surface on a honeycomb composite core
does the profile of a line or surface have any special interpretaion when it comes to composite core. i have a coworker telling me that the profile of a line or surface tolerance can be measured at any point along the line/surface. this creates an issue with our attempt to define the profile of a cut on a piece of core.
in this situation with the honeycomb core, the cell diameter is 0.1875 in and the profile tolerance is .003.
if his definition is still the current one accepted even for composite cores then the .003 tolerance can not be held if the profile line/surface intersects any cells of the core, which is inevitible.
does anyone know?
thanks,
bsk
brokensoul,
a profile tolerance can be measured at any point along the surface, and must pass at each and every point along the surface.
is the profile being applied to the top surface, or to the profile of each honeycomb?
jhg
the profile is being applied to a plane that intersects the walls of the honycomb core at an angle. the desired effect is to control the imaginary sloped plane which in essence is only a true surface every .182 in for ~.005 in. at the edge of every intersected cell of the honeycomb.
this question came about because we are trying to find a gdnt method to communicate the desired part edge. of a feathered honeycomb core.
any ideas?
brokensoul,
the top of your honeycomb is at least approximately a continuous surface. the non-presense of 95% of the material is irrelevant. a plate with 95% of the material removed by machining is precisely analagous.
jhg
if i understand what you are trying to communicate, flatness is what you should use. it seems that all the edges are continuous, even if the edges are only .005 wide if they are all connected then flatness will control it unless it needs to be relative to another surface then profile of a surface or angularity is what you should use depending on the application of the feature. i hope i understood what you were trying to say.
powerhound, gdtp t-0419
production supervisor
inventor 2008
mastercam x2
smartcam 11.1
ssg, u.s. army
taji, iraq oif ii
brokensoul,
could you provide an image of the part you are talking about.
catmann
don't neglect to consider issues of mesurement method along with tolerances. cut honeycomb has fuzzy or deformed edges on cell walls. how do you measure that to 0.003"? you could define the position of a flat plate pressed onto the core with a certain pressure.
perhaps "tangent plane" is in order for this application.
powerhound, gdtp t-0419
production supervisor
inventor 2008
mastercam x2
smartcam 11.1
ssg, u.s. army
taji, iraq oif ii
we had the same problem for first article inspection. the way we resolved it was to machine a "substitute" material to the same specifications ie. phenolic, fiberglass and measure that object to accept the fact that the machine was capable of producing the desired surface, knowing that the honeycomb cells were not truly a flat surface. once this is proven you can produce this sample material as part of your inspection plan or spc to maintain your confidence that the desired surface is obtainable over time.
although like others here, i question the fact that your trying to hold a known irregular surface to .003" we struggled with a profile of .010".
i too think the profile of a surface is possibly too stringent for this material and that profile of a line should suffice depending on the application. you simply want some level of assurance that the cut line is within a certain range, or if it's a mating surface then possibly a flatness callout is necessary. hope this will help.

joejack7
mfg. engineer
"fighting the 'good' fight"
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】olerance profile surface or profile line yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 10:51 AM
【转帖】profile of surface vs profile of line yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:29 PM
【转帖】profile of a surface on a honeycomb composite core yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:27 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:36 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多