几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 12:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 rounding or not of tolerance in fcf with dual dimensioning

rounding or not of tolerance in fcf with dual dimensioning
just a general question
when dual dimensioning a print that has gd&t. when converting the metric tolerance in the fcf, do you round if the 4th number is over 5? example - .4mm = .0157 would you round up? or leave it at .015?
solid edge v20
what do your tolerance stacks permit?
this one is .1mm total tolerance
solid edge v20
here is a good reference
often it's a good idea to add a 'significant figure' to reduce to effect on tolerance range. since inches are an order of magnitude bigger than mm.
kenat,
one rule of thumb i would use is that the tolerance of the secondary unit is to be equal or less than the primary. if the tolearance is rounded to a number that is greater than the primary tolerance, it would be possible to pass a part on the basis of the secondary tolerance that would not pass per the primary tolerance.
peter stockhausen
senior design analyst (checker)
infotech aerospace services
cadman1964,
i think we have had this discussion a couple of times.
do not generate dual dimension fabrication drawings. use one set of units to show requirements. provide the alternate units for reference, only.
on a 3d cad package like solidworks, you can get away with some stupidity, since the computer is working out the dimensions and the conversions. the numbers in your fcf almost certainly are typed, and you are manually calculating each conversion factor. what is the shop allowed to do when the numbers do not agree?
jhg
this is the problem with dual dimensioned prints. i worked at a place that insisted on them despite my objections so i had a note in the title block that said inches were the manufacturing units and the mm were for reference only. i think you will have to settle on one set of units as inspectable and the other as reference. if the mm units become reference, then i believe rounding up is fine. that's what i did. the other thing i would do is change my inches to match mm like instead of applying a flatness of .005 to a surface, i would make it .004 and that would give me 0,1 to put in the fcf.
powerhound, gdtp t-0419
production manager
inventor 2009
mastercam x3
smartcam 11.1
ssg, u.s. army
taji, iraq oif ii
quote:
i think we have had this discussion a couple of times. do not generate dual dimension fabrication drawings. use one set of units to show requirements. provide the alternate units for reference, only.
yes i do know that's the better practice. but, this is customer generated and sometimes, even knowing were not product designers, we have to draw there part up to there standard.

solid edge v20
see page 89 (10.2.2.2)
dual dims where killed in 1982. you'd think this corpse would be buried by now.
matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
position tolerance of the opening which is in distance from huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:13 PM
【转帖】position tolerance of the opening which is in distance from yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:20 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:36 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多