几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 12:43 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 rss equal to 3 sigma

rss equal to 3 sigma
i have an assembly of parts with defined size tolerances.
parts stack on top of one another. i must assume that tolerances for each part would fit within normal distribution.
when i calculate, rss, (taking the square root of the sum of the tolerances -->
1.00 +/- .002
.500 +/- .003
.75 +/- .004
.500 +/- .005
.600 +/- .003
(.002^2 + .003^2 + .004^2 + .005^2 + .003^2)^.5 = .0079
given above, is it reasonably safe to say that 99.7% of time part thickness will fall within 3.342 and 3.358
more simpler...does rss equate roughly to 3 sigma?
for some reason, i thought the rss was equal to 1 sigma equal to standard deviation but i think i've been wrong.

my understanding is that straight rss = +-3 sigma
kenat,
as is my understanding of rss.
v
arthur bender (back in 1963 or there about) suggested (in a sae paper) that a the rss value should be moderated with a safety factor (rss x 1.5). he did so (i think) because he was concerned about unpredictable sources of variation. back then there was not such attention to the individual contributors being statistical capable... they were commonly assumed uniform (or goalpost) distributions. never-the-less unpredictable variation exists and safety factors moderate the risk between the arithmetic and statistical stack... choose wisely considering the expected process control of the individual contributors!
paul
as far as i understand it, the rss method doesn't use any particular sigma value. the meaning of the rss limits depends on how the tolerance limits were converted into normal distributions (i.e. what sigma value was imposed).
if the calculation is done as drdherl has, the sigma values of all the detail part distributions and the rss total are assumed to be equal. so the overall thickness will be within the 3.342 to 3.358 range 99.7% of the time if the detail part thicknesses are within their tolerance ranges 99.7% of the time. the 99.7% comes from the properties of the normal distribution, where the range between -3 sigma and +3 sigma equals 99.7% of the area under the normal curve. this also equates to a cp value of 1.00.
if a sigma value of 2 was imposed, then the overall thickness would be within the 3.342 to 3.358 range only 95% of the time.
hope this helps. more later if needed.
evan janeshewski
axymetrix quality engineering inc.
drdhrl,
rss is a slang term...root sum squares...it actually is pirated from the electrical engineering community...and really does not have much revelance...boo!
i'm an experienced dimensional analyst & asme gdtp-s.
i'll try to explain the mathematics:
when we add those material thicknesses you listed the distributions must be added by the rules of statistical convolution. that's a pretty complicated term...and the mathematics are pretty complicated for most distributions...except impulse (constant) distributions...and normal distributions.
elementary statistics lesson 1...there are 4 moments that define a statistical distribution. those moments are 1st (mean), 2nd (variance), 3rd (skewness), and 4th (kurtosis).
variance is sigma squared.
next...i'll define the random process x as the sum of the material thicknesses you listed.
1. when the distributions are normal, the mean of x is the sum of the individual material thickness means.
2. when the distributions are normal, the variance of x is the sum of the variances of the individual material thicknesses.
therefore if we know +/- 3 sigma of the individual material thicknesses, we can figure out +/- 3 sigma of x...in setting up the equation you will just see a factor of 9 on both sides of the equation.
i have a mathematical explanation...tried to attach it to this post...i could send it if it does not appear.
michael


a simple way to answer this...
the sigma value of the rss tolerance analysis depends on the sigma value of the manufacturing process used to produce the part.
if the part is manufactured using a +/- 3-sigma process, then it will be a 3-sigma tolerance analysis result using rss. or, put another way, you will have 27 bad parts per 10,000 parts built since it would fall within a 99.73% distribution.
-rob
promoting, selling, recruiting and student posting
are not allowed in the forums.
(add stickiness to your site by linking to this professionally managed technical forum)
title: drafting standards,
description: drafting standards, gd&t & tolerance analysis technical support forum and mutual help system for engineering professionals. selling and recruiting forbidden.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
rss correction factor for tolerance stack-up analysis huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:42 PM
【转帖】what is six sigma yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:15 AM
【转帖】use of equal space as a basic dimension yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:04 AM
【转帖】rss equal to 3 sigma yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:48 PM
【转帖】rss correction factor for tolerance stack-up analysis yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:47 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:03 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多