几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD/CAM/CMM » SPC质量控制
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 08:55 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 expected overall compliance

expected overall compliance
dear all,
if i test a sample of material with multiple specified parameters i can calculate the expected compliance for each parameter.
e.g.
parameter 1 is expected to comply 90% of the time
parameter 2 is expected to comply 95% of the time
parameter 3 is expected to comply 85% of the time
if any parameter fails the overall result for a sample fails.
so from the above information is it possible to calculate the expected compliance of a sample with all respect to all parameters?
tia hugh
that depends on whether there is any correlation between the parameters.
if they are truly independent then the probability of a pass is 73%
cheers
greg locock
greg,
thanks for the response
i think i get and grasp your logic and get an answer of 72.675%
thus;
85% - (85% of 10%) = 85% - 8.5% = 76.5%
76.5% - (76.5% of 5%) = 76.5% - 3.825% = 72.675% (=73ish%)
am i correct in this?
the parameters are not independent (of course)!
kind regards hugh,
well you got the right answer, so in the new maths that means you understand it.
in the old days
p(a and b and c)=p(a)*p(b)*p(c)
if they are not independent and you understand the physical dependency then monte carlo modelling is often a good way to understand what is going on.
if on the other hand you just have a statistical description of the interrelationship then draw a venn diagram and sum appropriately.
cheers
greg locock
greg,
thanks for your help again.
p(a)*p(b)*p(c) looks less complicated.
seems i am going through 'old days' without actually having lived them!
much appreciated.
regards hugh
it just goes to show that not everything that is "new" is actually improved. while it might be fodder for a separate thread, to the old math. i can tell i am going to have fun when it comes to work with my son through the new math.
regards,
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】odgimaterial issues yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 08:49 PM
【转帖】dd 2.1.0 does not handle text fit as expected yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 07:02 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:59 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多