几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 08:59 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 8000gal water tank foundation design

8000gal water tank foundation design
ok, i know that there have been many similar threads, but i still do not think they answer my questions...
i need to design a foundation for a water tank with the following info:
volume = 8000 gal
height = 20 ft
diameter = 9 ft
flat bottomed tank w/ 6 anchors
soil bearing capacity = 2000 psf
design snow load = 69 psf
live roof load = 20 psf
basic wind speed 70 mph
seismic zone 2a
extreme frost penetration = 60"
well, here are my questions:
1. since this is an anchored tank, i would assume a ring wall type footing would be the solution?
2. awwa d100-96 states that the minimum footing depth should equal the frost penetration level. but this gives a 6'-6" high footing??? so do i then need to go with piles instead?
3. i have used the procedures in api 650 to determine the wind and seismic overturning moments. so now i have overturning moments based on either wind or seismic forces, and gravity forces based on dead, live, and/or snow loads. but how do i size the footing based on this?
neither awwa d100-96, nor api 650 goes into detail when it comes to the actual footing design.
i guess i can "unfold" the circular footing and treat it as a continuous footing. but how do i distribute the longitudinal forces (tension(uplift) and compression) due to the moments along the linear footing?
4. in a previous thread, an equation (from gaylord, et.al.) for the reinforcement required to resist the lateral earth pressure due to the surcharge was provided, so i think i have that covered. unless there are other methodologies?
thanks,
cmhski
check out our whitepaper library.
1) normally, a 9' diameter tank wouldn't have a ringwall- it would just be cheaper to make a solid slab. which in your case is sounding like a solid "chunk". but you could use a ringwall if you wanted to.
2) use a foundation that deep, or a shallower slab and expect some movement due to freeze/thaw cycles. check with engineers in your area. you should be able to make the slab where it moves as one piece, as opposed to breaking up under soil movement. i can't think why you'd need to make it any deeper than what other foundations or pavements in the area are.
3) size the footing to maintain wind overturning stability and allowable bearing. calculate moment at the base of the footing. assume linear stress distribution, so that moment pressures become mc/i and axial loads become p/a. simplest way is to design so that there is no uplift on the light side, although that's not a requirement. minimum factor of safety against overturn is usually 1.5.
4) on a tank of this size, the reinforcement based on actual loads will be minimal. use the minimum reinforcing ratios for walls (if it's a ringwall) or slabs (if it's a slab) from aci-318 or other sources.
based on the info above, you might consider insulating the tank.
you might also check with the tank manufacturer to see if they do foundation design (common with larger tanks).
if this is a welded or bolted steel tank, i believe the design codes will require higher wind loading than what you indicate (typically 100mph, 18 psf on cylinder).
we normally have the footing or footing pedestal extend 12" to 18" outside the tank for the proper anchor bolt placement. a 11' or 12' od footing should be sufficient. even at 6.5' depth you are only talking about 23 - 25 c.y. of concrete.
the linear loading about the perimeter of the tank (dl ll etc )is minor and is carried/distributed by the bottom plate.
tincan
one other suggesting, check your stability against wind when the tank is empty, this may be a worse case for your foundations.
cmhski - i'd say put it on a raft foundation - but, why is it anchored? you intimate that the frost level is down some 6 ft - this is rather deep but then your allowable bearing is rather low. but you could raise the footing by using insulation to minimize the depth of frost penetration. this may suggest puttin the tank on "legs" sitting on the mat foundation then the insulation could also be placed under the tank (assuming that the tank might be empty from time to time in the winter). but, too, you have insulation problems with the tank and plumbing.
thanks for all the recommendations/suggestions!
i guess i need to clarify a couple of issues:
1) the tank is insulated all around.
2) the manufacturer is specifying the anchorage.
3) in general, i鈥檓 only designing the footing 鈥?the tank itself is being designed by the manufacturer.
cmhski
for this size of tank, the wind loading is only
18x9x20 = 3,240# wm moment = 32,400'-# at the base of the tank = 53,784'-# at the base of the 6'-6" footing. for a 13'diameter footing, s = 215.7 ft^3 fbwl = m/s = 249 psf.
for a tank weight of 9,500#, liquid loading of 79,000#, footing weight of 99,000# (13'od x 6.5')
dl = 108500/132.7 = 817 psf
lil = 79000/132.7 = 595
misc ll 90
total 1,502 psf
seismic @ 438 psf
wind load @ 249 psf
the max loading is < 2000 psf.
the loading on the footing is uniform, reinf should be minor.
best, tincan
is the soil bearing capacity the allowable value or the value at soil shear plane development? the soil pressures developed by the tank do seem low enough when compared to the soil bearing capacity. as for foundation design, the frost penetration zone only becomes a concern when dealing with the possibilty of soil movement such as frost jacking of piles or when relying on the skin friction of the pile for resistance or if the tank is on expansive soils. normally what would be the expected would be something like a matt slab say 1-2 ft larger (all around) than the exterior suface of the tank, top and bottom reinforcement each way, the top surface of the pad shold be sized for maintence requirements and graded to promote drainage, rubber (1-2) layers should be placed under the tank due to the top sloping surface of the slab and imperfections in the top poured surface, compacted subgrade followed by compacted gravel then the slab. just a question: if it is a water tank what will happen to the tank when freezing temperatures come around? is there a requirement for a double walled tank or a containment wall around the tank?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
5 story basement, 30 below water table huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:50 AM
1st concrete tank huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:51 PM
design process outline airfoilsengines huangyhg 精密机械 0 2009-09-05 10:36 PM
【转帖】decimal dimensioningfractional equivalents yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:21 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多