几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 09:12 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 a325 bolts

a325 bolts
i have an inspector who is checking some a325 bolts in slip critical connections that i designed. the bolts are supposed to be tensioned to 19 kips. the inspector is useing a torque wrench to check the bolts. what is the required value that he should be looking for(ft-lbs)?...i found a method of calcing the torque but it requires a "torque coeeficient"...(k)..that i cannot find. my bolts are a325 5/8" diameter...galvinized.
also i'm not sure that his method is correct in checking the torque. the bolts have been installed for about 2 months and from what i read some relaxation of the connection and elongation in the bolt will effect the tension...if anyone has any comments or input i would like to hear some....thanks
check out our whitepaper library.
he, the inspector, should be using a skidmore-wilhelm testing machine to calibrate the torque wrench. in doing so he will be checking the actual lot of bolts (so as to consider galvanizing etc) to a specific tension level - the torque wrench can then be calibrated on that or the reading taken so as to note when the actual field bolts are checked.
levelrod is the expert on this...rod, where ya at?
generally there is about 20% loss due to relaxation and elongation for galvanized bolts.
danny_m (visitor)9 jul 02 7:24
sorry, i made a mistake
the nut factor(you call it "torque coeeficient") for unlubricate galvanized bolts is 0.2.
par060...qshake is right on target. the skidmore-wilhelm device should be used as a field correlation measure of torque value showing on the wrench to tension value achieved in the bolt.
analytical relationships have been tossed about for years and sometimes they are relatively close to actual values, but not reliably and consistently so.
the s-w device is a hydraulic load cell that allows you to place a bolt and nut sample directly into the device and tighten the bolt with a torque wrench. as the bolt is tightened, the tension is the bolt shows on a gage on the s-w device. the scale on the gage is marked by bolt size and tension. once the required tension in the bolt is achieved (in your case 19k), the torque value on the wrench is read. several of these are done and an average "job torque" is determined for that day with those bolts. this should be done routinely, as there are quite a few variables that change the job torque value.
your inspector 'should' have a skidmore and if he does not, he will have access to one. any bolt up job that is critical should re calibrate the torque wrenches/impacts each morning. the problem is in setting up the skidmore. it requires a much longer bolt for testing purposes than you will normally find in use on the job (generally, but not always, of course). i normally ordered extra long bolts just for testing while in the refineries. testing and checking the calibration of our impacts was done weekly there, but is often done more frequently depending on the job, bolt size changes, etc.
if your job is 'super critical', just set the skidmore up on a column and you can retest in a matter of minutes any time you wish . any combination of dry, oiled, waxed bolts/nuts/load indicators etc. can be tested in the field with very little effort.
i am not sure what part of the world your in, but any bolt up job in l.a. starts with calibrated torque wrenches. if there is any doubt, they must be re-calibrated. often testing extends several months after the job is completed. i am not aware of any changes in standards due to that brief timespan. i have been out of the loop for four years now, but i doubt things have changed much.
rod
as a ps---ts bolts will not wrench torque to the same values as conventional bolts after installation. they generally will turn at a somewhat lower value (a 3/4 a-325 conv. say at--- 355ft/lbs and ts at 325ft/lbs. not totally accurate numbers, just a referance, ok?)
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
a325 bolts x or n huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:12 AM
a-354 vs a490 bolts huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:11 AM
1 inch machine a307 bolts torque value huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:24 PM
ansi 9standards0 code issues - use of gavavanised bolts huangyhg American standards 0 2009-09-05 05:58 PM
【转帖】asmeb107.100-2002-b94.9-1999标准 huangyhg American standards 1 2009-09-01 09:28 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:42 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多