几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:43 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 anchor bolt configuration on a base plate

anchor bolt configuration on a base plate
hi,
the connection of a silo leg to a foundation has been designed. there are 4 anchor bolts on a rectangular the base plate. the shear and tension capacity of 2 bolts is sufficient. if i replace the 4 bolts by 2 bolts would the configuration matter. what is the minimum number of bolts required?
thanks
check out our whitepaper library.
the configuration does matter by a greater degree. changing from 4 bolts to 2 bolts would demand a redesign of silo leg and the foundation pedestal/footing.
while 4 bolts can be assumed as a fr base, 2 bolts would mean a low pr base (depending on how you arrange the bolt configuration). the k factor for the column leg would be double (at least in one axis) which would result to unusually large leg for a silo. the pedestal/footing size would be substantially reduced due to the absence of fr moments.
my opinion was based on my previous designs of silos. hope to hear comments from anyone.

osha requires 4 bolts for building columns - the concept being that during erection the columns are put in place without any lateral bracing and until the rest of the structure is installed this presents a hazard.
for your silo, if its part of a complete component that would stand on its own, you probably don't have to worry about it - but if the silo leg is initially placed by itself, there would be a concern.
as far as structural design goes, two bolt columns have been used in the past. however, if one bolt gets damaged (which does happen quite often) then you'd be in trouble with only one bolt left.
i forgot to mention this;
i was referring to silo legs with no braces, case where bulk carriers are loading underneath and other equipment installations that prohibits braces. one of my previous design (1990) was a 450 mt fly ash silo on 15m legs, no braces, 2-75mm dia. x 1.4m anchor bolts (2 bolts - specifically requested by client engineer, my objections then).
if your silo legs are fully braced, then 2 bolts would not be a problem, it only boils down if there are codes that prohibit it, on the design point of view, i cant re
thank you all for the messages.
the silo is seismic rated and the legs are braced. there are 6 legs placed in a circular fashion. meaning 24 bolts to be placed in precast. due to the constrution issues if even one bolt is off by an inch, can the precast anchors be replaced by drilled in anchors?
silo's are usually pre engineered. so, is it the suppliers responsibility to determine whether the silo needed is seismic rated or non seismic?
sutki1,
i've worked in the silo and agg bin industry in the us for about 12 years. concerning your question about "the suppliers responsibility to determine whether the silo needed is seismic rated or non seismic" i'd have to say based on my experience that sometimes they do design per the appropriate requirements, but many times they don't. if you are concerned (and you probably should be) ask someone in a position of responsibility to get the design specs and if necessary the calcs. is there a pe involved? who is the engineer of record?
regards,
-mike
osha requires all column base plates must be designed and fabricated with a minimum of four anchor rods.
"osha safety and health standards for the construction industry, 29 cfr 1926 part r safety standards for steel erection" (can be found at
osha allows two anchor rods at columns which either: weigh less than 300 pounds (that is the column itself weighs less than 300 pounds); or are not axially loaded and are laterally restrained at the top.
daveatkins
reread 29 cfr column anchorage 1926.755 and saw only four bolts allowed plus design for 300 pound eccentric load 18" from face of column. where is the exception of column weight under 300 pounds and not axially loaded found?
hi all, just a thought;
i am not in the us, so i am not concerned with osha. but as a thought, ive been working on many projects (all outside us) and 2-bolt configuration is very common, which in design can be modelled as pr base or even conservatively as pin base (at least in one plane). one obvious advantage with 2-bolt configuration is the simplicity in construction for cast-in-place anchor bolts. during construction, i have not observed damage in erections of 2-bolt config. either, as long as the column is properly erected with temporary braces/guy wires.
i don't know where it is documented, but osha calls the column types i described "posts."
daveatkins
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
analysis of submerged flat plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:39 AM
a seemingly simple question but in fact very difficul huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:10 AM
a column at center of tank bottom plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:03 AM
10 ft continuous weld beam to cover plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:26 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:01 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多