几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:25 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce-7 seismic requirements for small buildings structures

asce-7 seismic requirements for small buildings & structures
i design industrial platforms and other small (less than 2 stories or 20 ft high) structures. am i correct in interpreting asce-7-98 section 9.5.2.5 exceptions 1 & 2 as not requiring any type of seismic loading to be considered in the design of these structures?
find a job or post a job opening
i believe that if you kept reading that section, you will find that you are permitted to use the simplified method of analysis per para 9.5.3.8 and your structure should be in seismic use group i. you are not exempt from seismic analysis in any event.
by the way, you should be using asce 7-05. your reference is two editions old.
thanks. i agree.
keeping up with the latest versions of all codes and standards i need to gets to be expensive.
out of date standards could cost you dearly when subjected to plan review by third party engineers.
but what if your state code refers to an old state (such as new york city).
my software uses the current edition of the code.
the simplified seismic base shear and such is now in chapter 12 of asce 7. seismic gets chapters 9 through 22 now!
there was a post a while back on the topic of current standards. typically a city will specify an edition of ibc, and it in turn will specify an edition of asce 7. last one i looked at, city specced ibc 2000, which references asce 7-98. but it does vary.
chapter 1 of ibc allows for alternate forms of compliance and most jurisdictions accept newer referenced standards. make sure your submittal drawings indicate the standard to help protect yourself.
however, if there is a less stringent item in the current standard compared to the older, the building official may require you to adjudicate the requirement to protect himself from liability. most building officials would support the variance request since future codes will probably incorporate the new requirement.
don phillips
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 7-98 wind load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:20 PM
asce 7-05 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:16 PM
asce 7 rooftop structures factor huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:57 PM
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:40 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多