几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 03:03 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 beam splice model

beam splice model
please see attach sketch. one splice in one span works fine. but when i placed two splices, left most span, both sap and staad show instability. but it is a real life situation and a evry senior engineer is doing it manually. i just wanted to cross check and learn using s/w. any tips ?
the first pin on the far left (just to the right of the far left support) should not be there. you can't have a pin like that and remain stable.
also, it appears on the far right spans that you have double pins (two small circles side by side). a joint must have at least one non-pinned
jae is correct. i hope it is not "a real life situation".
quote:
but it is a real life situation and a evry senior engineer is doing it manually. i just wanted to cross check and learn using s/w. any tips ?
what is s/w? if senior engineers are doing this, they ought not to be senior engineers.
ba
i believe that s/w is software. at least that is what a few other engineers at my office call it.
joel berg
i assumed as much. is it too much trouble to write the word software, particularly when you are expecting
it's not stable. the span on the left is the issue. it has a mechanism in it. if the support farthest to the left was fixed instead of pinned then it would be stable, but as it stands, it isn't stable. it shouldn't take software to see that.
if you draw a fbd of each individual member you will see that the two left-most
spans 2 and 4 are also problematic, not just span 1.
the thing is...with a four span cantilever and drop-in system, you can only have three hinges and remain stable. the sketch shows six, although in two cases they are sort of double hinges, which makes no sense. perhaps the op can advise what he really means.
i agree with hokie here. this setup makes no sense in the real world. it is inherently unstable three times over.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
dgkhan,
i agree with what the previous posts have said.
only one of those thre spans is truly stable.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
beam design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:52 PM
beam bracing questions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:45 PM
beam above another beam - with gap huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:44 PM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM
current state of model based definition huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:05 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多