几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 04:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 brick arch

brick arch
i am building a home, and have a brick arch over an entry way. due to a mistake, the arch is wider and flatter than originally intended. i don't have any experience with masonry, and was looking for some guidance on how to confirm that this arch is adequate to support the weight of the brick and stone above it? here is a picture:
analyze the arch with loads, and assume pinned on top of the columns. watch out the thrust at support.
the one over the upper storey window and the one over the entry doors both look in proportion. the one over the entryway, however, looks like there is not much to resist the thrust. i wouldn't accept it.
i design steel frequently, but i'm not sure how to analyze this situation. i can model an arch in staadpro, but i'm not sure what material and section properties to use to simulate the arch? once i determine the thrust load, i'm not sure how to determine if that is acceptable.
hokie66, what are my options, to tear it out and start over?
do a web search for masonry arches and 'ring'. this is a program that was developed in england for checking historic masonry arches.
dik
it could be very messy, but if you could drill from the side of the arch, end to end through the wall and the ach, then you could put a rod, end plates, and tension it, eliminating the thrust problem.
it is the only solution i can think of appart of satisfying yourself that the arch is stable. it would be very messy but easier than tearing it down
i think the mason can provide beams bolted on the wall between the window & the arch to support the brick above. then rebuild the arch below to proper shape.
if the structural strength is the only concern, perhaps you could place a steel angle below the brick on the inside face designed to carry the weight above as a curved beam.
if the appearance is also a concern, you would have to rebuild the brick arch.
ba
my main concern is structural integrity, i can live with the appearance.
i have no experience with brick work, can anyone comment on whether the arch "looks" like it is adequate? i'm just asking for a gut feel based upon your experience, on whether the arch looks like it is adequate to support the weight.
thanks,

you might have to dig into design on masonry arche. the horizontal thrusts it exterts on the columns are the focusing concerns over both strength & stability. otherwise, it does not look too bad from the photo.
brick arches are not my specialty. the only time i have used them is when i had lots of wall on either side to take the lateral thrust. the arch over the main entryway looks as if it has been behaving well to date, but like hokie66, i have some concerns about the lateral forces acting on the jambs.
you may get some useful information on this link:
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
brick arch floors huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:46 PM
bolt anhor in old brick huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 04:05 PM
bearing on old brick huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:15 PM
bearing capacity of thru-bolts on brick huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:14 PM
anchor brick failure - could cause be water huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:55 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:41 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多