几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 01:56 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 copied cds as shop drawings

copied cd's as shop drawings
do you allow copies of your construction drawings to be submitted as shop drawings, from a steel fabricator, for example? why or why not?
thanks in advance.
matt
as long as they release you from dimensional correctness, & as erection drawings only, all the time.
they might as well benefit from your labors as well. i actually will give them my cad files. again, as long as release you from dimensional correctness.
i like it whe they at least ask before hand. i have seen many sets were they just show up that way.
we usually make them sign a release agreement absolving us of dimensional correctness, inconsistancies between bid documents and addendum items, etc. we also remove our title block from the drawings. in cases where there are numerous sheets to the structural set, we sometimes ask (but don't always get) a small "per drawing" fee, such as $50 to $100 per sheet, depending on circumstances.
denoid:
if they are saving x dollars in not having to draft the thing, why not ask for their drafting fees? short of that, shouldn't the owner be credited that fee (assuming it was in the bid)?
ml13:
by asking for a small fee, we are usually just trying to recoup some fees for our time for writing our short contractual agreement, cleaning up the drawings, zipping them up, e-mailing, etc. - we aren't really trying to charge them drafting time. after all, they are a sub-contractor, who we usually like to stay on relatively good terms with for jobsite relations, future projects, etc.
in my view, the shop drawing process is a beneficial 鈥渆xtra set of eyes鈥?which reflects the fabricator鈥檚 understanding of the intent of the contract documents and the means and methods of fabrication. this is important to the owner, the design team, and the general contractor because such submittals are the work of the fabricator and as such they take responsibility for the fabrication, means and methods. in addition there is a greater chance that errors or fabrication conflicts will be discovered by the design team and the general contractor. if the fabricator merely copies the details on the documents and does not perform an independent check, are they providing the service that is intended? i say no.
rrmiv raises an excellent point. i much prefer that the subcontractor does his own independent set of plans/details. but, as the rolling stones once said, "you can't always get what you want".
rrmiv's point is good - but perhaps there is a middle ground - shop drawings involve both erection (plan-type) drawings and specific piece drawings.
the latter must be created from scratch and this is where the vast majority of "errors" are found and questions asked. the construction document plans are simply a map of where the pieces go so we usually allow them to copy our plans.
we do include a note on our plans:
the structural drawings are not intended for use as shop erection drawings. reproduction of these drawings in lieu of preparation of shop erection drawings signifies the users' acceptance that all information shown is correct and appropriate for shop drawings and that the user will be fully responsible for expenses that may occur from said acceptance
i do not allow my design drawings to be copied and used as shop submittals. shop drawings, in my opinion, act as last chance for the detailer/engineer to catch a mistake and or rectify an error! if the design plans are used for shop drawings, then the error may not be caught.
i can tell you many times that cad and new technology got us in trouble. a case in point, site plans were plotted with perfect boundaries and bearings. the plans were signed and sealed. the contractor insisted on using the cad file so his surveyor with gps can stake out the site.
guess what! the cad file was mistakenly rotated few seconds and thing did not fit! fortunately, the problem was rectified. now had not the surveyor used the legal singed and sealed hard copies, no fuss nor would delays have taken place.
i have many other problems with steel framing and dimensional conflicts to name... but i will spare every one.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
certify fabrication drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:17 PM
certification of shop drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:16 PM
cad files for shop drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 06:06 PM
bim and dimensions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:49 PM
【转帖】itile block yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 10:45 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:05 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多